..aus dem MJJC..
Originally Posted by Vici
You called it.
4:34PM PDT: The jury foreman just explained the logic behind the verdict. They felt Murray was competent to do the job for which he was hired -- to be a good general practitioner. Jurors felt Murray had gone to a good school and was qualified. The juror added, "That doesn't mean we felt he was ethical. Had that question been in there, it could have been a different outcome"
Exactly^^. I think everyone should read this, because some are forgetting or do not understand what the questions are asking. Panish connected that question to being hired for what Muarry did in that bedroom and Putnam connected it to what was written in the agreement. Once the jury asked for those documents people should know they were going for facts to answer those questions. That is why you cannot just take little pieces of the contact and run with it, but read the whole thing!
It seems they used the oral contract for question 1.
Now the bad news: AEG is going to ask Katherine to pay for some of their costs. Guess who is going to be paying here? Yes Michael. Expect to see some interesting payments in the estate accounting. Expect information about Michael to be leaked like how the e-mails were leaked.
...joa..so isses..und Michael zahlt noch einmal