Don't worry about the translation... It simply took some words like the album names and translated them. It also mistook "song shout" for something else. It translated it as "song-shout" or sort of like a shout in a song.
As far as my opinion goes, I'm right there with you. Dangerous and HIStory were and still are by far my favorite Michael Jackson albums.
The huge range of different styles of music are awesome and something that hardly anyone has ever managed on a pop album. That is the case especially with Dangerous. HIStory right up there too in my opinion... But for a different reason. In HIStory we get a raw Michael. A sort of rough Michael.
At the same time it's really new and original. The beats in They Don't Care About Us, the beat box on Stranger In Moscow - it's amazing! Scream was completely new for its time and something really fresh!
I remember hearing the song for the first time and going "WHAT THE HELL WAS THAT?!"
Whereas on Invincible you get a Rodney Jerkins who is so intimidated by the genius of Michael that the album comes out sounding (musically) not like Michael Jackson, but like Rodney Jerkins doing Michael Jackson. And that can't be right...
What I really miss about Invincible is that sense of new, fresh music. At the time it was released, the music Michael was making, was already on the scene for a year or two.
Obviously, I'm hoping for a new style, fresh music, that sort of thing. But obviously Michael is only human, and nobody can go on reinventing themselves over and over again all their life. And if Michael can't create something truly fresh the way he did with all his albums up until Invincible, my preferred style of music would definitely be Dangerous and HIStory.