The importance of the Michael Jackson Verdict: 14 years on.

June 13, 2019 • By Admin Team

Today marks the 14th anniversary of the day Michael Jackson was found not guilty of all counts in the trial of his life, a trial that pushed him to his physical and mental limits, where he was required to prove that the accusations lodged against him, again, were totally false. Over the last decade since his passing, this moment in Jackson’s life has been downgraded as almost insignificant. The verdict was largely accepted and the world moved on. Unfortunately in 2019, we must acknowledge the 13th June and the utmost importance that it holds, because once again, it’s become all too relevant.

The first few years that followed the verdict, I was a vocal advocate of the result, making sure that the public were reminded that Michael Jackson was found not guilty. We’d had these accusations thrust into every social gathering, every newspaper we read, every magazine, it was now our time to thrust the verdict back in their faces.

After the first three years, I decided that it was time to move on from the verdict. I’d had the satisfaction of reminding the public of his innocence and felt that any future acknowledgement of 13th June would only serve as a reminder that he was accused, not that he was found not guilty. Jackson wanted to move on from this terrible time and rebuild his life, so it didn’t need any of us harking back once a year.

However, times have changed and today it’s more important to speak about 13th June and the huge significance it has in the discussions of Jackson at present.

On reflection, what does the verdict actually mean? I think that’s really a two-fold question into what it ‘should’ mean and what Jackson’s detractors want it to mean.

Ultimately, the verdict asserts the fact that Michael Jackson did not abuse Gavin Arvizo. There was no room for ‘yes, but maybe’ or ‘not enough evidence’ to support the accusations. A four month, lengthy trial took place, with multiple witnesses, multiple pieces of ‘evidence’ presented by the District Attorney, which Jackson’s legal team, headed up by the calm and collected Tom Mesereau proved was utter nonsense. We’re to believe that the entire concept of Jackson being a paedophile rested on the fact he owned a selection of art photography books, selected from a library, of 10,000 assets. In addition, the apparent ‘eye witness’ testimony of Star Arvizo who claimed to have bypassed the alarm on Jackson’s bedroom, climbed the steps, which he re-told to the number, and claimed to have witnessed Jackson abusing Gavin. On cross-examination, Star’s testimony was blown out of the water and his claims were exposed for their ridiculousness.

But we don’t need to replay the facts of the trial. The court transcripts have long been available. Countless interviews from Mesereau, Conspiracy by Aphrodite Jones and countless other source materials will affirm for the reader exactly why, aside from the fact Jackson wasn’t actually guilty, he was found not guilty.

Furthermore, there’s the first witness testimony, opening the case for the defence, former dancer, turned now-Jackson-accuser, Wade Robson. His testimony is significant today for a number of reasons, not mostly because he sat on the stand and told the truth, that Jackson never behaved inappropriately with him in any way. This is a statement he stood by when interviewed in 1993 and countless times over the 20 years that followed.

Robson clearly stated his position and answered the questions as they were directed to him.

He started by outlining how he’d connected with Jackson after their initial meeting in Australia on the BAD World Tour

As I said, we’d had no contact with Michael or anything. Somehow my mother got in contact with Michael’s secretary at that time, who was Norma Stokes.

Followed by discussing his visits to Neverland with his mother and sister, the latter of whom also stayed in Jackson room. And yes sister means female here.

He was then asked twice if Jackson had ever molested, touched him in a sexual way or touched him inappropriately, all of which Robson confirmed Jackson had not. Additionally, he confirmed he understood exactly what Jackson was being accused of.

In closing, Mesereau asked Robson, “Has anyone told you what to say in this courtroom today?” Robson’s answer was a firm ‘No’.

All the responses Robson gave back then at the age of 22 are in direct contradiction to the claims he makes today as a fully-grown adult.

Today as he tries to make the ludicrous claim that he defended Jackson firstly because he claimed not to be aware sex between an adult and a child was wrong, but later claiming it was out of fear and and intimidation from Jackson, before finally claiming Jackson coached him on what to say. Each point contradicts the other and all contradict the responses he gave, under oath in the 2005 trial.

What’s interesting is that the questions asked by the prosecution in cross-examination were specific enough about whether Jackson touched Robson, “Mr. Jackson would periodically kiss you, would he not? Periodically hug you? Touch you? Put his hands through your hair? Touch you about the head and the face? Did he ever kiss you on the cheek? Did he ever kiss you on the lips? – Robson wasn’t asked to determine if these were prerequisite for abuse, he was asked it they happened. He confirmed he wasn’t periodically kissed, kissed on the lips, had hands through his hair, but that Jackson would hug him, something Jackson has been photographed doing with children and adults all over the world, for decades.

In the lead up to the defense’s case, 500 people were explored, contacted and interviewed as options and the Robson family were deemed some of the strongest. Jackson and his attorneys did not need Robson as they had another 499 people in the pipeline, but after extensive interviews to check his suitability, Robson took the stand. If there was any truth in the prospect that Jackson had abused Robson, it would have been a frankly idiotic move to put him on the stand, as oppose to anyone else from the pool of 499 people.

What the trial did serve to do is to put Robson’s true story of his experiences with Jackson in the public domain. Bear in mind that Jackson was not being accused of molesting Robson, that’s not what he was on trial for, but Robson’s testimony served as almost character-witness in nature. For those who claim Robson ‘helped get Jackson off’, again are over emphasising the Robson-agenda. Robson’s testimony and character-witness presence would have been rendered useless if the prosecution were able to prove that Jackson abused Gavin Arvizo, after-all, that’s what he was on trial for. Seeing as Arvizo’s claims had more holes than a colander, it wasn’t difficult for the defense to tear apart the thinly veiled attempts to accuse Jackson.

Where the trial testimony from 2005 becomes relevant once again is when we look at, what relevancy chaser, Oprah Winfrey refers to as ‘patterns of abuse’, No matter how hard they try and claim it, there is no ‘pattern’, and here’s why.

..............................

..........

If our ill-educated Leaving Neverland audience believe that Jackson abused Robson and Safechuck then they have to accept that Chandler/Arvizo were NOT abused. If they (stupidly) believe Chandler/Arvizo were abused, then they have to accept that Robson and Safechuck were not. If they were smart, they’d see very clearly that neither Chandler, Arvizo, Robson or Safechuck were abused by Jackson.

Simply put, the accusations made by Robson and Safechuck in their movie do not match the accusations made by Chandler or Arvizo. We’re meant to believe that Jackson went from being a full-on child rapist to the most self-controlled abuser in history. The patterns Oprah and Co want the world to believe, are just not there, because it’s clear that the abuse didn’t happen.

Where there are patterns, as is evidence from the 2005 trial testimonies, is that Jackson was generous with families who he came into contact with, that he would welcome them into his home, treat them like family and allow them to share in the good fortune he’d worked hard to amass. This was a good-natured, generous individual. What this wasn’t, was ‘grooming’.

In the late 80s, Jackson invited his then-manager Dileo to Neverland Ranch as he had somebody he wanted him to meet. On arrival, Dileo met ‘Dave Dave’, the little boy whose father had set him on fire. He was in the arcade room with Jackson and Dileo recalled how Jackson allowed the boy the freedom of all the games, how Jackson’s success could allow this child to find enjoyment when he was in so much pain. Dave Dave also wanted to learn how to shoot film and Jackson funded equipment and education to help him achieve this. The two remained life-long friends.

For Ryan White’s 16th Birthday, Jackson gifted White a Mustang convertible. Again, Jackson used his good fortune to bring joy to somebody. Today we see the same thing echoed; Usher purchased Justin Bieber a $100,000 Fisker Karma sports car for his 18th birthday. Recording artist and Leaving Neverland Sympathiser Sia purchased her protege Maddie Ziegler an Audi for her sixteenth birthday.

You’ll notice that Jackson’s actions are labelled grooming by those who want to assert guilt to him, whereas the actions of the others mentioned, were not. These same kind of actions were what the prosecution in the 2005 trial were attempting to use to support nothing but a theory. A theory that was easily dispelled when you look at just how wide Jackson’s generosity would stretch.

As we learned from the testimonies and stories from the hundreds of people who were around Jackson, he was a kind, generous, giving person. Dileo recalled in 2012 that during the BAD Tour, Jackson would have his team contact hospitals and find out what equipment they needed and then request his team source the equipment and pay for it. “If a hospital needed a new x-ray machine, or something like that, he would get it for them.” – That is who Jackson was.

District Attorney Thomas Sneddon dedicated an entire decade to attempting to prosecute Jackson on the accusations of child abuse, which included sporadic public appeals for other ‘victims’ to come forward, a phone line, the use of other departments to investigate Jackson and aiding the false narrative that was spread about Jackson through the media. His 10 years of commitment hung on the idea that Michael Jackson had abused Gavin Arvizo AFTER the airing of Living With Michael Jackson. The same Living With Michael Jackson that caused a media storm and shone a spotlight on Jackson. The fall-out for Jackson was such that his team explored ‘crisis management’ options on how they could repair his image and negative media coverage Jackson was receiving. Sneddon took the opportunity to put out his own press release detailing under California law an adult sleeping in a bed with a child was not deemed a criminal offense, unless “affirmative, offensive conduct” occurs.

With attention solely focused on Jackson and the media on a rampage, It’s the weeks after all this that Arvizo claims the abuse by Jackson took place.

In June 2003, Sneddon claimed to ‘re-open’ the case against Jackson, when in truth, he personally had never closed it. And so desperate was Sneddon to get Jackson on something, that lesser charges and accusations of kidnap were added to bill of counts. Anyone who has been to Neverland or even outside of it will attest to the fact the fence is all but rendered useless in terms of security, allowing pretty much anyone or anything to pass through.

As the circus played out in court, what became apparent is that the prosecution’s case lacked any foundation and was built on a rag-tag bunch of disgruntled ex-employees and the Arvizo family’s own testimonies. From morally corrupt individuals who had attempted to sue Jackson in the past and lost claiming to have ‘witness Jackson abusing children’ but chose to do nothing’, to the prosecutions attempt to assert that Jackson’s extensive range of straight, legal, adult, female pornography was kept to ‘insight abuse’, to the Arvizo’s claiming they were kept from knowing the time when at Neverland, in-spite of the multiple clocks, including the giant one that sits in front of the 1994 train station, it’s a wonder that the entire case was not thrown out. But it played out until June 2005 when the jury returned on 13th to deliver a clean sweep of not-guilty verdicts.

On reflection, in getting to that verdict, a deep look at Jackson’s life and conduct took place and what was revealed helps to strengthen Jackson’s innocence as he is once again being accused today. What we saw was a man who was sensitive to the needs of those less fortunate, a man who understood the talents of others and wanted them to use these talents to be the best they could be. A man who was generous with his giving, and a man who wanted desperately to be part of a bonded family unit. But what also transpired was the etchings of a man who could be easily manipulated and used in the pursuit of money. The Arvizo’s accusations demonstrated just how ridiculous claims again Jackson could be and how easily they could be given a platform by the mainstream media, whose obsession with Jackson hasn’t waived before, then or since. The trial forced very private parts of Jackson’s life into the mainstream (such as his straight, adult, female porn collection) that further strengthened the case against the prosecution’s claims and against the narrative of the recent movie, and in the long run, that’s a good thing.

But, it has been used in a negative manner, in the example of the current accusations which were formed from research and not from memories. Information hidden from Robson’s own lawyers revealed that he had researched the accusations against Jackson and even went as far as to email himself links to anti Jackson websites. In addition, the accusations follow the narrative of disgusting padeophilia fantasy piece ‘Michael Jackson Was My Lover’, a book that’s been fully discredited and debunked. It’s because of these points and ones such as Robson’s communications with his own mother that both Robson and Safechuck’s allegations show clear signs of being constructed from research. You’ll notice how there are zero similarities between their accusations and that of Arvizo, Because Arvizo lost in his attempts to extort Jackson and so his claims or testimonies would be of no use if a success was to be gained.

As Jackson walked out of the courtroom, the world saw a man ravished by the last few months; broken, emaciated and deeply distressed. This was not something that could be falsified and not the actions of a guilty man who’d gained a lucky escape. This was the appearance of an innocent man who had been certified not guilty, in a court of law, by a jury of his peers.

The verdict remains one of importance when dealing with accusations against Jackson and is far too easily side-swiped by those who are so hell-bent on wanting Jackson to be guilty, irrespective of fact. Because what it demonstrates is that not only was Michael Jackson not guilty of abusing, kidnapping or giving alcohol to Gavin Arvizo, he is not guilty of the accusations of grooming, manipulation, predatory behaviour and any other text book accusations the Me Too movement attempted to feebly sticky tape onto Jackson.

Jackson maintained his innocence through-out his entire life and spoke very openly about what it felt like to be accused of such heinous crimes. The verdict was the truth he knew; he wasn’t guilty and regardless of all the noise, on 13th June 2005, that was proved.

Pez Jax

Follow Pez on twitter @Pezjax

https://www.mjvibe.com/the-imp…kson-verdict-14-years-on/

Lies Run Sprints But The Truth Runs Marathons

Deboleena Aich

Jun 13

13th June 2005- the day when ignorance was conquered by wisdom & facts; love had won over hatred and prejudice. The decades of propaganda against an innocent man by the mass media was overthrown by the verdict- ‘WE THE JURY IN THE ABOVE ENTITLED CASE FIND THE DEFENDANT NOT GUILTY’, a total of 14 times.

Fourteen years ago, on this day Michael Jackson was rightfully vindicated in a court of law after being falsely accused of sexually abusing Gavin Arvizo, along with other charges of false imprisonment and intoxicating a minor, all of which were examined by the jury in a court room that lead to a unanimous not guilty verdict on all 14 counts, after a four month trial.

Gavin was introduced to Michael Jackson on June 2000 when the boy was ailing with cancer and was undergoing chemotherapy treatment, through comedian Jamie Masada. Jackson, who always made efforts to comfort and help children in distress contacted Gavin and his family to support them during that difficult phase. After a month or two, the Arvizo family visited Neverland Ranch for the first time. It is important to be aware of the fact that Michael never shared a bed with either Gavin or his brother Star. It thus, undermines the ‘bed-sharing’ logic of the detractors. On their very first visit to the ranch, the brothers requested Jackson to let them sleep in his bedroom. According to Frank Cascio, his personal assistant at that time too was present with him and recalled the mother being too insisting and seemed to push his sons onto Michael Jackson. Out of kindness, Jackson allowed the boys to stay in his room despite being reluctant to do so, in the presence of Frank Cascio and his own children, Both men slept on the floor while the kids fell asleep on the bed.

The Arvizos made no assertions of molestation that night in any of their versions. ( They repeatedly changed the timeline of alleged abuse and the details. This is a common trait associated with all of MJ’s accusers, isn’t it?) According to Gavin’s own testimony, Jackson wasn’t in much contact with him or his family during the years, before the shooting of the Bashir documentary in 2002 titled ‘Living With Michael Jackson’. Under direct cross examination of Gavin by Thomas Mesereau during the trial, his main wrath over Jackson was that he didn’t maintain any touch with him, despite the fact that it was Michael Jackson who arranged for the boy blood donation camps and helped him with his battle with cancer.‘There’s no reason he should have stopped calling me”, lamented Gavin on the stand after being asked by Thomas Mesereau what made him angry towards Jackson. You don’t expect this answer from an alleged abuse victim, do you? He was bitter because he didn’t think that Michael Jackson served enough favors to him rather than the abuse that he had allegedly suffered. (Again, a common trait related to MJ’s accusers).

It all started after the documentary ‘Living With Michael Jackson’ that aired in the US and the UK in 2003 where Jackson was seen holding hands with Gavin and the boy resting his head on Jackson’s shoulder which resulted in an array of negative publicity and speculations. However, what’s deliberately ignored is the fact that it was Martin Bashir who had directed Gavin to initiate this stunt and also intentionally manipulated his narration to cast a misleading light on the audience and to paint a gloomy prospect of him and his relationship with Gavin. “Oh, Bashir? He’s a RAT!”

On March 2003, Janet Arvizo had already hired a lawyer named William Dickerman who later claimed that Jackson’s associates were harassing the Arvizo family. Dickerman contacted Larry Feldman to represent them, the same attorney who had represented the Chandlers in 1993 and had negotiated the civil settlement of 1994! More surprisingly, Feldman decided to send the Arvizos to Dr. Stanley Katz, again the same psychologist who was involved in the Jordan Chandler case in 1993! Why is it so that even before the family made allegations of sexual abuse, they were referred to the same lawyer and the psychologist who were associated with the 1993 case? Apparently, the Arvizos couldn’t pursue for a civil settlement because DA Tom Sneddon had changed the law that prevented the civil case from going ahead of the criminal trial to satiate his desire to convict Michael Jackson, when in 1993 he was unable to even sought for an indictment.

Gavin made allegations of sexual abuse against Jackson for the first time in June 2003, to Dr. Katz. Till the time, the case made it to trial in 2005 the timeline of the alleged abuse and the details such as the number of times the molestation had allegedly occurred, changed on numerous occasions. The details of the conflicting accounts of abuse can also be observed in the difference of the versions between the prosecution’s initial complaint and that of the indictment. Star also alleged to have been inappropriately touched by Jackson in a golf cart, but Sneddon somehow never charged him for abusing Star.

The Arvizos had claimed that the first incident of molestation took place before the recording of the rebuttal video, in order to deal with the backlash after the Bashir documentary. The problem is- the entire family were still praising Jackson as clearly seen in the video. They however, asserted that they were being forced to take part in the making of the video but the outtakes proved otherwise. They looked more than happy and at one instance the mother surprisingly exclaimed, “Oh! We’re on camera!” The story changed later, altering the claim that Jackson had started molesting Gavin after the video was taped and the family had already given several interviews to the Child Right Services........

.......OH! We’re on camera!

The prosecution charged Jackson for allegedly conspiring against the Arvizos, for holding them captive in Neverland against their will. This charge was brought in 2005 after the Grand Jury proceedings so as to come up with an explanation that the family was forced to participate in the rebuttal tape. It was claimed by the prosecution that Michael Jackson abducted the family with the help of other co-conspirators, but none of them except for Jackson was indicted and so none of them could testify for the defense! Janet Arvizo claimed that she had been held hostage at Neveralnd, but receipts proved that during the period of her alleged imprisonment, she had left the ranch and was enjoying shopping sprees and cozy beauty parlor treatments. She was also caught scamming celebrities and journalists in the name of Gavin’s illness, even though his medical bills were already being covered by insurance. She also accused the JC Penny guards of sexually abusing her and reached a financial settlement in 2001. She admitted that the allegations were fabricated and absolutely false.

Why would Michael Jackson be tempted to molest Gavin Arvizo only when the authorities and child protective services had already started their investigation after the airing of Bashir’s documentary? Why would he feel the need to imprison the Arvizos for taking part in the tape when nothing inappropriate had occurred until then and they themselves were willing participants for it?

It was also claimed that Michael Jackson intoxicated Gavin to be able to molest him and made him and his brother drink alcohol. It was however, debunked during the trial that the Arvizo kids themselves were caught in the wine cellar in Jackson’s absence multiple times.

Star Arvizo claimed to have witnessed Jackson molest Gavin in his bedroom while he stood near the stairs and peeped through the room’s door which was left open. The alarm that haters love to use as a plausible argument to prove his guilt cannot explain how come the alarm didn’t save Jackson from being supposedly caught. A test was carried out to disprove Star’s claims and it was being proven that Jackson would have been alerted about his presence and Star’s account of witnessing abuse was simply impossible.

Seeing his case on the verge of being in shambles, Sneddon urged to introduce ‘evidences of prior bad acts’ in an attempt to further prejudice the jury because the credibility of the Arvizos had already been ripped to shreds due to no evidence even after vigorous investigation and extensive searches of Jackson’s property by more than 70 sheriffs in an unannounced raid in 2003. June Chandler, Jason Francia, Blanca Francia and the disgruntled employees of the infamous ‘Neverland 5’ were called in by the prosecution but to no avail as each one of them had immense credibility issues and an obvious financial motive behind the allegations. Hence, Michael Jackson was not only exonerated of the 2005 allegations but also of the 1993 allegations as well and every accusation hurled against him were proven to be absolute lies.

The prosecution failed miserably to prove their arguments. Till date, there exists no evidence that proves Michael Jackson harmed anyone, let alone a child. No accuser of his was devoid of an evident money driven agenda, with full support of the press and the mass media. The district attorney was fully aware of the sheer ridiculousness of the case but nevertheless, took it court just to humiliate Jackson in the most abominable way and to be successful in convicting him;that would have been the most defining achievement of his as a district attorney.

The media made use of every tactic to convict Michael Jackson in the court of public opinion but had incurred a heavy loss as a result of the final verdict. News channels had already started reporting about the cells and the treatment that would have been meted out to Jackson if faced with an conviction, the type of clothes he would have been made to wear in jail or the food they would offer him in prison. See, how they talk about keeping an eye on Jackson 24 x 7. What a sumptuous treat for the media it would have been to broadcast a daily segment of the footage straight away from jail!

... Even before the jury rested its case, the media had already started reporting about the conditions of the jail and how excited they sound just at the mere idea of Michael Jackson being convicted at least of one count of child abuse.

It’s conceivable why the salivating media and the tabloids never accepted the verdict. The dream of a billion dollar industry crumbled and came crashing down. There’s hardly anyone who accept their defeat in this world, specially when the efforts to prejudice the jury and the public was carried out with such great intensity with not a shred of decency. The defense case was given little airtime and attention while the prosecution’s claims were treated as ‘gospel’. The media was more interested as to why Jackson arrived at court in pajamas, when he was summoned by the judge to appear for the hearing directly from the hospital after he had injured himself due to a sudden fall. Jackson had bruised his spine and coughed blood. Such was the magnitude of the sufferings that he was made to go through.

Michael Jackson arrived to court in pajamas from hospital suffering a back injury which the media sensationalized as the infamous ‘pajama day’, to deflect from Gavin’s cross examination.

A desperate Tom Sneddon didn’t shy away from using the most salacious practices to prosecute Jackson. He went as low as to fabricate false fingerprint evidence of Gavin Arvizo on an adult magazine. It didn’t work well for him as the magazine he argued had Gavin’s fingerprints was published 5 months after the Arvizos had finally left the ranch. It was him who allowed the boy to handle the magazine without making him wear gloves during the Grand Jury proceedings and later sent it for fingerprint analysis!

Faux experts like Jim Clemente, who often uses his connection to the FBI as a card to verify his credibility but in reality possesses no factual knowledge about the case whatsoever. Clemente took to Twitter claiming that Gavin had accurately described Jackson’s genitalia. When challenged with the fact that why the prosecution failed to introduce this bombshell evidence in court, his comeback was a lame response that all evidences cannot be presented before the jury.

............

.........

As laughable as it sounds, Sneddon had even made a last minute attempt to introduce the description of Jordan Chandler in court even though he was aware that in Jordan’s absence (he had refused to testify in the trial), Judge Melville would never allow it to be used as an evidence. We, by now know that Jordan did not describe Michael’s private parts accurately and is the reason why Sneddon struggled to bring charges against him in 1993. It’s impossible that he would afford to leave out such an important testimony from being used in the trial. Gavin didn’t even know that Jackson had brown patches all over his body when asked under cross examination. He responded saying,” I didn’t know about patches. I thought he was just white”.

There’s no doubt about Michael Jackson’s innocence and the whole case was a travesty of justice. The whole course of the trial had taken a heavy toll on his physical and emotional health. He was fragile and broken. He never really coped up with the trauma of being accused of such a heinous crime of hurting children and the abashed nature of media’s bigotry. Michael Jackson was the victim of the twisted court of the public and the trial by media for which ‘Ignorance is Bliss’.

Michael Jackson was immensely devastated during the trial. He never recovered from the unbearable pain.

The vindication day is of more significance than ever before for our community, so as to give a befitting answer to the media and their concentrated efforts to rehearse the debunked allegations against Michael Jackson, in the wake of Leaving Neverland. It is to prove to people like Dan Reed that he’s not to hail himself as the dictator of Jackson’s legacy and that he’s fooling himself with his own delusions and ego. He should have been the first one to investigate the allegations of the two subjects of his film, given that one of the prime accusers of Leaving Neverland is apparently responsible for obscuring justice to Gavin Arvizo and never bothered to reach out to him if Reed sternly believes in his claims. Dan Reed made a recent statement that the 10th anniversary of Michael Jackson’s passing must be recognized as a day to contemplate child abuse. That’s a pretty good suggestion when it’s actually him who with his erotic film has contributed in giving incentives to child predators and the dangerous illusion that children find physical acts with adults as ‘sexually fulfilling’ and doesn’t think twice before referring to child sexual abuse as ‘romantic or ‘period of honeymoon’.

‘Pose for the camera! We’re finally relevant as victims.’

Let’s contemplate the downfall of journalism and the demise of critical thinking among the people instead.

Advocates of social media label anyone who are knowledgeable regarding the absurdity of the cases as apologists or cultists. We refuse to jump on the MeToo bandwagon and follow the footsteps of advocates like Jim Clemente and Dan Reed- fabricating myths and rumours, putting on the lens of perversion and the lust of being relevant,exploiting the emotions of the gullible masses. Who can be a more better example other that Oprah Winfrey or Ava Duvernay who use the MeToo lynchmob or promote the importance of ‘presumption of innocence’ whenever it’s profitable for their image and brand? So, who’s the cultist here? Guess, these people are in dire need of an Oxford dictionary!

But, what they cannot change is the fact that MICHAEL JACKSON WAS AND IS INNOCENT!On behalf of mankind, we’re sorry Michael!

It’s not a matter of your opinion. There’s nothing called as ‘MY TRUTH’ or ‘YOUR TRUTH’. It’s only the TRUTH.