??? Well said and soooooo true...

Thank you Phil Collins

Von wegen!!! Später klang das angeblich so:

PHIL COLLINS: 8 SHOCKING REVELATIONS FROM HIS MEMOIR

4. He hung at Michael Jackson's Neverland Ranch with his family

To celebrate Thriller's 10th anniversary, Billboard awarded Michael Jackson a special trophy at their 1992 show. However, because the King of Pop had to head out on tour the following day, Jackson pretaped his acceptance speech with Collins.

Riding up to Neverland Ranch in a limo with then-wife Jill Tavelman and their daughter, Lily, the family was greeted by workers in what he describes as Disneyesque uniforms. "There's muzak tinkling in the gardens and children running around in the on-site amusement park," Collins writes.

Then Jackson entered. "He’s very sweet and friendly. All thoughts of the weird things I’ve heard disappear in an instant," he reveals. "I don’t bat an eyelid when he invites Lily and Jill to pal upstairs in his toy room."

While cameras were setting up in Jackson's studio, the singers made small talk. "He apologizes for his pale makeup. It’s for a skin condition [Vitiligo], he tells me. I get the impression he feels safe with me," adds Collins, "And not just because, as the L.A. Times later notes in its report on the telecast, I’m an 'English paleface.'"

Though it's a brief encounter, Jackson left a lasting impression. "Michael Jackson, though clearly not the same as us mortals, is not the weirdo we’ve been led to expect," he continues. "A brilliant musician and a nice guy who’s had to live an extraordinary life from the age of 5. But, even though I have no direct knowledge of the murkier side of Michael’s life, I have to say that there’s probably no smoke without some kind of fire."

Rest im Link:

https://www.genesisfan.net/phi…4lERYy31hMAbHO8lXg5bVmMpA

#TheMJCastEp100 - #BradBuxer Special

Brad, along with @MichaelPrinceMD, was arguably #MichaelJackson’s closest collaborator. We discuss his story, MJ’s creativity, their final work & more. J. ??

? https://t.co/T7ATYefscX
? https://t.co/12rkb34t8I
? https://t.co/OjGuckFr98 pic.twitter.com/9fjfmBCzL2
— The MJCast (@TheMJCast) 6. Mai 2019

So excited to not only be charting on the Oz Music @ApplePodcasts Chart with #TheMJCastEp100, BUT to be right alongside one of absolute top fave podcasts @JOY_eurovision is an absolute honour! ????
^Q pic.twitter.com/fhF8FuRLDs
— The MJCast (@TheMJCast) 6. Mai 2019

Madonna Defends Michael Jackson Over “Leaving Neverland”

May 7, 2019

The Queen of Pop spoke out in the magazine Vogue about “Leaving Neverland”.

Madonna has broken her silence over the Michael Jackson sex abuse allegations, saying “people are innocent until proven guilty.

I don’t have a lynch-mob mentality, so in my mind, people are innocent until proven guilty.

“I’ve had a thousand accusations hurled at me that are not true. So my attitude when people tell me things about people is, ‘Can you prove it?'”

Asked what would constitute proof of Michael Jackson’s guilt, she replied: “I don’t know, I haven’t seen the film.

“But I guess it would be people recounting actual events – but then, of course, people sometimes lie.

“So I always say, ‘What’s the agenda? What do people want out of this? Are there people asking for money, is there some kind of extortion thing happening?’

“I would take all of those things into consideration.”

She said of the HBO and Channel 4 documentary: “I guess I’ll get around to seeing it. I haven’t seen it yet.”

The King and Queen of Pop went to the Academy Awards together in 1991.

Madonna later called it the “best date ever” and revealed the pair had shared a passionate kiss.

https://www.mjvibe.com/madonna…n-over-leaving-neverland/ SOURCE: Yahoo News

Ein erster Teaser zur neuen Pro-Michael-Doku (nicht Taj!), die kommenden Monat auf Amazon Prime gezeigt werden soll.....

https://twitter.com/fei_rock/status/1125928425636737024…

An old friend is defending Michael.

"Now I'm here! If it were not for Michael Jackson, we would not be talking. Michael is to me as my second father and I will be grateful to him as long as I live. All charges against him are false! Just leave him alone. ''- Bella Farkas#MichaelJackson #MJFam #MJInnocent �� pic.twitter.com/bD4t0LE8jS
— Michael Jackson ♚ (@SoldiersOfLove_) May 7, 2019

Should we trust Jackson’s accusers?

by Luka Neskovic
Times of Israel

Marx’s famous remark is that history always repeats itself twice: first as a tragedy, then as a farce. What to say when it is numerically determined? In the case of Michael Jackson the number ten seemed to be fatal. Ten years after the Chandler scandal from 1993, Jackson is charged with sexually molesting Gavin Arvizo. Ten years after that case, choreographer Wade Robson has suddenly “realized” that he was abused by Michael Jackson “from the age of seven to fourteen”, that same friend in whose defense he testified at the “trial of the century”, saying that nothing improper had happened between them. The Los Angeles County Court dismissed his lawsuit since it was not filed within a reasonable time after the alleged crime.

Let us not forget: the year 2013 – when Robson raised a lawsuit against Jackson’s Estate in Los Angeles – was another in a series of posthumous triumphs for the King of Pop. Statistics were showing that he was highest-paid dead celebrity in the world and that Michael Jackson: The Immortal World Tour was one of the leading world tours – the same tour for which Wade Robson was rejected as a creative director. Was that a coincidence?

Not only that, at the beginning of this year, ten years after Michael Jackson’s death, another “friend” also “realized” that his case was also abusive, roughly at the same time as Robson claimed in his statement. The boys who knew, perhaps even hated each other before, because of the attention that their idol did not know how to distribute equally, were united in a common goal in a mutual “confession”, full of emotions and explicit details of sex, presented in the four-hour marathon co-produced by HBO.

The story was even more publicized recently thanks to Oprah Winfrey who, as a victim of sexual abuse herself as a child, showed sympathy for these two men. No one, however, asked her what was happening in school for girls that she opened in Africa or did she has in plan to interview victims of her dear friend Harvey Weinstein? Her relationship with Michael Jackson, after a historic 1993 interview at Neverland, was not of a pleasant nature. Perhaps with this act of pluralism she would break the partiality that she feels toward Michael Jackson’s “victims”.

While reading the comments on the portals and news sites on the internet I was surprised by the reaction of the general public. Unlike the Arvizo case, which left the public with reasonable doubt about the way Chandler case had ended ten years before, now I can see the growing sympathy for Jackson while he becomes a victim of media sensitivity for sensation and profit. The motives of the accusers become apparent when the circumstances in which they are filed and the integrity of their testimonies are taken into account. We can openly call them lies while there is no evidence to substantiate their claim. Everyone, at the end, is presumed to be innocent and totally innocent until they are charged with a crime and then convicted by a jury of their peers.

Jackson is no longer among us to defend his good name. He spent two years of his life in a legal battle in the court before he went out as an innocent man. All aspects of his privacy were put in front of the public while hundreds of witnesses moved to the test bench, so after more than five months of a trial there was a verdict that said he was not guilty on all ten counts. To doubt Jackson’s innocence, in this case, would mean doubt in the US legal system.

Michael Jackson was, without any doubt, a controversial and eccentric figure that has left enough material which will, in spite of speculations, spill over for decades to come. And in those years that will come, we will see some middle-aged men who have been suffering from amnesia for decades, but what at the end will remain? A monolithic Jackson figure that will sell albums, movies, memorabilia and fill arenas, magazines and books. All Chandlers, Robsons, Safechucks will get their fifteen minutes of attention that they desperately struggle for. Jackson’s figure will remain larger than life.

https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/shou...sons-accusers/

https://medium.com/@deboleena.…blic-opinion-5a525f8d1bf1

Michael Jackson’s Trial in the Court of Public Opinion

Deboleena Aich

Apr 2

‘The Michael Jackson cacophony is fascinating in that it is not about Jackson at all. I hope he has the good sense to know it and the good fortune to snatch his life out of the jaws of a carnivorous success. He will not swiftly be forgiven for having turned so many tables, for he sure grabbed the brass ring, and the man who broke the bank at Monte Carlo has nothing on Michael. All that noise is about America, as the dishonest custodian of black life and wealth;the blacks, especially males,in American;and the burning,buried American guilt;and sex and sexual roles and sexual panic; money,success and despair’ ~James Baldwin

...weiter im link!

https://twitter.com/danreed1000/stat...55446868033536

Thank you Dan for you “documentary” it has made me a fan of Michael and appreciate his music even more. It made me realize what a good hearted person he was and how badly he was treated by people in return. It was an eye opener.
— Daana (@Daana12_) 13. Mai 2019

I feel the same I never listened to or read so much about @michaeljackson before this crazy doc and now am convinced he was truly innocent- a victim of the media. Plus, his kids seem so well adjusted and passionate about helping the homeless. Thanks 4 raising awareness
— Carol Lynne (@carolyn525) 13. Mai 2019

Beginning to wonder leaving neverland was made to prove Michael Jackson was innocent
— Richard Patrick (@SnakeHaven) 13. Mai 2019

Honestly I'm listening to MJ more than ever since the documentary came out. Ive been listening to mj on a daily basis for 6 weeks straight. Absolutely love it..Thanks dan for bringing mjs music back into my life! It's not just me either,his streaming numbers have also increased.
— Ricky jo (@Rickyjo77644882) 13. Mai 2019

I did not know Michael Jackson very well before all those YouTube videos defending him came out. It made me discover the wonderful person that he was. He was too pure for this world. I'm not surprised the wolves ate him up, and are still fighting over his bones.
— Jimmy Costa (@JimmyCosta17) 14. Mai 2019

Honestly, thank you for LN! Seriously. I would’ve went the rest of my life thinking MJ was a musical genius who was guilty and not realized he was a genius who was also an amazing human being who did so much for others and was constantly the victim of extortion and vultures.
— Hoodisms (@Hoodisms1) 13. Mai 2019

Nice to see Britney's support!

Wie gesagt.. find es immer noch sehr "befremdlich", dass ausgerechnet die Familie ein Crowdfunding zu dem Thema macht..

It's Britney, bitch.. find sie immer noch heiß!

#TheMJCastEp100 - 'Brad Buxer Special' is now up on YouTube, albeit a shorter version without two songs because of copyright.

To celebrate The MJCast's 100th episode, Jamon and Q put the focus back on music and welcome a particularly special guest, Brad Buxer. Buxer was one of Michael Jackson’s key artistic collaborators, who worked with Jackson for 20 years, from the Dangerous album onwards, and who would become one of his closest producers, musicians, and songwriters. Along with Michael Prince, there was no one else who Michael Jackson trusted more to capture his most personal creative visions.

The guys dive into an incredible, in-depth discussion with Buxer about his early life and music career working with icons such as Stevie Wonder, how he first came to work with Jackson, what it was like creating the Dangerous, HIStory, Blood on the Dance Floor, and Invincible albums, his role as Musical Director for both the Dangerous and HIStory World Tours, the experience of playing music and writing songs with Jackson, insights into Jackson’s life as a father, details about working together in the final years of Jackson’s life, his thoughts on unreleased tracks, and much more.

In addition, The MJCast is honored to have received many congratulations from previous guests on the show, whose audio snippets are included in this episode.

It’s been an amazing run so far, and incredible to watch the show evolve and grow. The MJCast team couldn’t be prouder to be well into Season 5. Jamon, Q, and Elise want to thank each and every listener, supporter, guest, and friend who has been part of this experience. We look forward to our next 100 episodes!

If you have any thoughts, opinions, or feedback on this Michael Jackson podcast episode, we’d love to hear from you. Contact us at themjcast@icloud.com or find the links to our many social networks on www.themjcast.com. Keep Michaeling! J. ??

“Leaving Neverland” Weaves A Provocative Narrative But Is It Just One Big Lie?

Posted On 14 Mar 2019
By : Dan Stephens
Comments: 26

Once the dust has settled, Dan Reed’s calculated storytelling in Leaving Neverland reveals itself to be a continuation of the anti-Michael Jackson narrative bias in news media; cynical emotional manipulation built on lies and ulterior motive. Don’t believe me? See if this doesn’t change your mind…

When I posted my reaction to Dan Reed’s documentary Leaving Neverland, one person on Twitter said it was fake news, that, by extension, I was wittingly contributing to an anti-Michael Jackson media bias. That was certainly not my intention. However, by choosing to highlight the impact of the sordid events alleged by Wade Robson and James Safechuck I was stoking the fires of a narrative that is predisposed to accept the iconic pop singer’s guilt without questioning the facts.

And because Reed’s film is so one-sided – and admittedly effective in piecing together a story that, at face value, appears genuine – we must give ourselves a chance to allow the emotional manipulation of clever storytelling to settle. To take a step back. To consider other factors and other opinions and other potential witnesses and even undisputed facts that, according to investigative journalist and long-time reporter on matters related to Jackson’s life, Charles Thomson, “catastrophically undermine these men’s accusations”.

It is Thomson, author of One of the Most Shameful Episodes In Journalistic History (about media bias in relation to the pop singer’s 2005 trial), who is one of the few commentators acknowledging the holes in Reed’s film. Not only must we consider them given the severity of the crimes alleged, but we must also question if the film is riding a wave of #MeToo hysteria where “truth” is garnered from whatever gains viral traction.

The Truth Needs Only Sensationalism & The Appearance Of Validation

Not only does the film present a compelling story but a search on the internet quickly reveals supposedly supportive conjecture from sources that boast credibility (including Vanity Fair’s 10 Undeniable Facts About the Michael Jackson Sexual-Abuse Allegations) One article published on the BBC’s website questions whether Jackson’s legacy is forever tarnished but this twists public perception away from questioning where this concept originated (the hoopla surrounding Reed’s film) and fuels the Jackson-Is-Guilty narrative by peddling emotion with sensationalist stories of his songs being cut from radio playlists and his Neverland house price dramatically dropping.

His guilt is assumed in this viral cooking pot of media dissemination because, oh, look Canada isn’t playing his songs anymore, The Simpsons aren’t playing the Jackson episode anymore, and his house has dropped in price. All these factors detract from a considered look at what Leaving Neverland said happened. And they detract from accepted truths in a court of law: the fact Jackson was acquitted on child molestation charges in 2005 after the jury unanimously found him not guilty of all charges.

With no right to reply afforded anyone in defence of Michael Jackson, Leaving Neverland is understandably effective in weaving a seemingly credible story of guilt (but one that relies on carefully orchestrated cinematic technique to provoke emotion, favouring sentiment in order to massage supposed truths). Under the guise of being a “documentary” and offering the viewer the freedom to make up their own mind, Reed, Safechuck and Robson conspire to make up your mind for you. As John Ziegler says in his podcast World According to Zig, at the very least this film is completely unfair.

Reed has tried to counter the criticism of bias by saying he showed archive footage of Jackson’s own denials. But as Charles Thomson says, because these allegations were made after the singer had died, the only people who could offer a genuine counter argument were the people who had been litigating the two accusers over the past few years.

Fact: Wade Robson & James Safechuck Are Liars (But Which Lie Do You Believe?)

Dan Reed (centre) with Wade Robson (left) and James Safechuck (right) in promotional photography for their film Leaving Neverland.

Oh, did you know Robson and Safechuck had been suing the Michael Jackson estate since 2013 for hundreds of millions of dollars? “This has generated thousands of pages of court documents – deposition transcripts, witness statements, disclosure motions, etc.,” notes Thomson. “That litany of paperwork includes so many contradictions. Their stories are constantly changing, they contradict their own prior versions of events, and one of them was caught lying under oath so brazenly that the judge ruled that no rational juror could believe his story.”

I’ll repeat that. A judge, experienced and qualified in discerning truth-tellers from fakers, said one of these men’s stories could not be trusted.

That, after the release of Leaving Neverland, was corroborated by Brandi Jackson, Michael’s niece, who declared Wade Robson a liar. Another convenience ignored by Reed’s film is the fact Brandi dated Robson. She told The Kyle and Jackie O Show: “When I was watching [Leaving Neverland], I was completely sickened by it, to be honest with you. The things that he was saying were so over the top and so ridiculous.”

Saying she did not believe her uncle was a paedophile, Brandi added: “[Wade] was not describing my uncle. He was describing a totally different person, but not my uncle. And that’s why this is a narrative that has changed… over the last 15 years. Everything that he’s ever said about my uncle is the complete opposite of who he was painting in this documentary.”

While Reed reveals the fact Robson twice testified under oath (once in 1993 and again in 2005) that Michael had never sexually molested him or behaved inappropriately, arguing, in hindsight, that he didn’t understand the inappropriate nature of his relationship with Michael as a child and thus believed it to be innocent, the filmmaker doesn’t question whether Robson now feels any guilt around missing the opportunity to stop an abuser of children when he appeared in court as an adult in 2005.

Brandi, who was in a relationship with Wade for a decade, is adamant her ex-boyfriend is lying. She says he and James Safechuck are solely motivated by money. The film is perhaps their final attempt to get money out of the Jackson estate having been trying for the last seven years.

...........

.....

The Witnesses That Dan Reed Conveniently Ignored

Says Ziegler, “In my opinion, if you simply listen to the interview with an open mind, Brandi’s credibility speaks for itself. There will still be people who will understandably still believe Robson’s version, but there is no doubting that Brandi’s narrative makes a whole lot more sense. But again, the primary question here is, why was her existence censured from Leaving Neverland and why hasn’t she been interviewed on network television about all of this?!”

Taj Jackson, Michael’s nephew, has also questioned why Wade would be with Brandi if he was being abused by Michael (and, according to Wade, being discouraged from dating women). “He dated my cousin for over seven years and it’s really interesting because they left that out of [Leaving Neverland] – and he dated her during the time period that he’s getting supposedly molested by my uncle. I think it’s ridiculous especially since my uncle Michael was the one that basically brought them together. And so it throws off the whole narrative of Michael Jackson only wanting [Wade] for himself or teaching him to hate women.”

Taj is now developing a a counter-documentary according to NME to dispute the claims made in Leaving Neverland which will likely feature other children who befriended Michael Jackson – such as Macaulay Culkin and Corey Feldman – and who have stated that they neither witnessed nor were the victim of sexual abuse. Singer Aaron Carter, who was friends with Jackson when he was a teenager, told TMZ he had the “time of my life with Michael”, adding “I hung out with Michael Jackson, I stayed at his house, I stayed in his bedroom … it’s hard for me to understand [the accusations in Leaving Neverland] – how am I supposed to understand that when my own personal experience with him was gentle and beautiful and loving and embracing.”

What is ultimately revealing in the fallout of Leaving Neverland is how news media is failing those it purports to inform. “One of the many difficulties in telling a version of events which is contradictory to someone the news media — as opposed to the courts — has determined is a “sex abuse victim” (especially those who, like Robson and Safechuck, have been sanctified by Oprah Winfrey on HBO) is that, particularly post #MeToo, no one data point can ever been seen as a “smoking gun” that their allegation is false,” notes Ziegler.

“However, when viewed in the full context of Robson’s already suspect narrative, I strongly believe that Brandi’s version of events comes as close as possible to being just that (as do many other non-Jackson fans who have spent the time to hear her, and her cousin Taj, out).

For Charles Thomson, this is a continuation of a news media bias that has been peddled for years. Speaking about the coverage of the 2005 trial, he says: “It seemed to me that the media was just loathe to accept the possibility that Jackson could be innocent. Most reporters seemed to already be convinced of Jackson’s guilt because they thought he was a weirdo.”

It almost didn’t matter that Michael Jackson’s innocence was proven in a court of law (“All too often you see right-wing pundits making comments like, “Not guilty is not the same as innocent.”) Indeed, Thomson notes how the prosecution had every advantage to win their case (but “failed to produce a single piece of tangible evidence connecting Jackson to any crime”) and ended up parading witnesses who “collapsed under cross-examination” with the other half “helping the defence rather than the prosecutors.”

He remembers a story by reporter J. Randy Taraborrelli, who was covering the trial and said he was with the press pack queuing for their court passes when a well-known female reporter from a big magazine said: “Does ANYONE here believe Michael Jackson is innocent besides J. Randy Taraborrelli!?”

That story, argues Thomson, “sums up much of the media’s attitude towards the trial: “We know he’s guilty. This is a waste of time. They should just lock him up now.” It tainted their reporting, consciously or otherwise.”

Setting The Narrative, Disregarding The Truth

Leaving Neverland has stirred up similar misreporting and misinformation around Michael Jackson that makes Reed’s effort – supposedly giving sex abuse victims a voice – at the very least distasteful, at worst, as Thomson states, “shockingly unethical”.

“Looking back on the Michael Jackson trial, I see a media out of control,” said the writer of One of the Most Shameful Episodes In Journalistic History. “The sheer amount of propaganda, bias, distortion and misinformation is almost beyond comprehension. Reading the court transcripts and comparing them to the newspaper cuttings, the trial that was relayed to us didn’t even resemble the trial that was going on inside the courtroom. The transcripts show an endless parade of seedy prosecution witnesses perjuring themselves on an almost hourly basis and crumbling under cross examination. The newspaper cuttings and the TV news clips detail day after day of heinous accusations and lurid innuendo.”

We’re seeing some of the same things now. Says Ziegler, “Not being armed with even the basic facts (inexplicably, and quite tellingly, Brandi Jackson is not even mentioned), the audience, including the media, was easily manipulated into being able to disregard even the biggest holes in their stories, and to gladly accept even the most bizarre rationalisations for their nonsensical actions. Once Oprah, an abuse victim herself, effectively validated their stories (even as Safechuck, who barely participated in the post-movie interview, sweated noticeably right in front of her), the preferred narrative was set, and nothing would then be allowed to credibly contradict it.”

Instead of the trial vindicating Michael Jackson, the media’s irresponsible coverage made it impossible. “The legal system may have declared him innocent but the public, on the whole, still thought otherwise. Allegations which were disproven in court went unchallenged in the press. Shaky testimony was presented as fact. The defence’s case was all but ignored,” notes Thomson.

Being critical of Leaving Neverland is not about silencing or shaming victims. That is despite British journalist Louis Theroux, a documentary filmmaker I admire, saying the exact opposite. But if we consider all the facts – facts that we’re not privy to in Reed’s film – we are likely to conclude Leaving Neverland does far more harm to abuse victims than it does good.

Diana Michaels, in her piece entitled “Leaving Neverland Debunked in 10 Minutes or Less”, states: “Abuse survivors need our support, and they especially need to be listened to when they are brave enough to speak out. However, we have to be cautious to not let the #MeToo movement jump the shark. If we accept all allegations without turning a critical eye when necessary, and we allow the #MeToo movement to justify putting the dead on trial, we won’t be doing anything but opening Pandora’s box. And real survivors of abuse deserve better than that.”

The sadness and anger that I felt after watching Reed’s film because I, at first, believed the accusers now remains for a very different reason. I’m angry that Leaving Neverland had that impact on me because I now feel duped, and I’m saddened that Jackson’s family and children have to endure such a negative media circus while his legacy is questioned. If there are stories to be told from behind the closed doors of Michael Jackson’s bedroom, Reed’s film is not the place to start hearing them.

[Edit] The original article referenced the Neverland ranch’s “value” as dropping but this has been changed to “price” as the term is more accurate.

Words by Dan Stephens

About the Author

Dan Stephens is the founder and editor of Top 10 Films. He's usually pondering his next list, often inspired by his adoration for 1980s Hollywood, a time-travelling DeLorean and an adventurous archaeologist going by the name Indiana.

https://www.top10films.co.uk/5…t-is-it-just-one-big-lie/

2nd teaser clip from the Chase The Truth documentary. Looking good so far.

teaser:

https://twitter.com/EntertainMeLTD/s...30488090882048 https://twitter.com/MattFiddesUK/sta...92682694467584

:top

Taj Jackson‏Verifizierter Account @tajjackson3

Here’s a great podcast interview I did with @Adam_Fn_Green and @TheJoeLynch.

Thank you both for wanting to get the truth out there about Leaving Neverland.

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/…326561266?i=1000439435567

Musician and filmmaker Taj Jackson (3T, TV’s THE JACKSONS: NEXT GENERATION) sits down with Adam, Joe, and Arwen to discuss the truth about his late Uncle Michael Jackson in the wake of the extremely controversial and polarizing HBO “documentary” LEAVING NEVERLAND. Together they dive deep into the details behind the 1993 and 2005 false allegations against Michael… discuss the potential dangers of abusing “cancel culture”… and shine a light on the numerous discrepancies and lies put forward in LEAVING NEVERLAND. Clocking in at 3 hours, this highly emotional and educational conversation stresses the importance of vetting the validity of accusations and the great injustice of blindly believing whatever we’re told.

As discussed in the episode, for more information we strongly recommend the following two videos:

LEAVING NEVERLAND: THE AFTERMATH -

RAZÖRFIST’s: THE MICHAEL JACKSON REBUTTAL (Part 1) - Our June episode of MOVIE CRYPT LIVE is going to be FREE for all listeners! Join us on Sunday June 9th starting at 8am PST with Arwen’s THRILLER dance party pre-show celebrating the music of Michael Jackson on the 10th anniversary of his passing. The LIVE show begins at 10am PST. *MOVIE CRYPT LIVE is normally only for our beloved Patrons in the appropriate tiers but this special live show is being made free for everyone! Just go to http://www.Patreon.com/TheMovieCrypt on Sunday June 9th a little before 8am PST to hit the FREE link that will be posted there. Trust us- you don’t want to miss a single beat of June’s pre-show!

Sahra Connor heute in der "Zeit"

Man darf ja keine Screenshoots mir Profilbilder oder so Posten. Jedoch hat Sarah das auf Nachfrage bei ihrer FB - Seite bestätigt. Ich hoffe kein MJ Fan kauft jeh noch mal etwas von ihr.

Traurig aber ich streiche immer mehr Künstler.

Unfassbar alle tun so als wären die Behauptungen, in der sogenannten Doku, bewiesene TATSACHEN!

3nach9 vom 31. Mai 2019, nehmt das Video unter "Sarah Connor" dann habt Ihr nur den Ausschnitt.

https://www.radiobremen.de/fer…HOox00lhR6XR9b4OqR9X6avfE