This is the guy who rules Hollywood

  • The man behind TMZ.com has all the Paris info
    Tuesday, June 26th 2007


    TMZ.com managing editor Harvey Levin in his California office.


    "My head is spinning," admits Harvey Levin, who has skyrocketed up the Hollywood power league as managing editor of TMZ.com, the Web site that's changed the landscape of breaking showbiz news.
    After admitting that he initially turned down the "Web site job," the lawyer-turned-investigative-reporter-turned-producer is in his element, having just completed a two-night stint hosting "Larry King Live" and cementing TMZ (which stands for Thirty Mile Zone) as the one-stop source for Paris Hilton's jail debacle.
    "You sit at the desk and you look at the microphone and you just think, ‘Wow,'"says Levin of his stint on the show, on which he brought together Paris' lawyer Richard Hutton and a representative of the L.A. County Sheriff's Department, to analyze the fallout from Paris' time in the slammer.
    Though Larry will reclaim his chair for the heiress' post-jail tell-all, Levin has his own opinions on the wayward heiress' latest mess.
    "The sheriff's department has taken so much heat on this case for doing the right thing, and they were in a dogfight with the judge behind the scenes," ­surmises Levin.
    "They were pitted against each other. The sheriff didn't even want to pick her up when the judge told him to bring her from her house arrest to the court, so this has turned the sheriff's department upside down," he adds.
    His advice for Hilton?
    "She's got to talk about what she reflected on in jail during this whole experience and how it's changed her. Because I think everybody wants to know that she's grown, and she said she's grown up. This is her chance to appear differently," he muses, with uncharacteristic leniency.
    "I always saw this as a grandstanding judge who
    totally overstepped his bounds. I also thought that the sheriff's department did a really commendable thing," claims Levin, who maintains that TMZ is simply trying to "call it the way we see it."
    "It's not like we're in bed with the sheriff's department. I mean, we went after them in the Mel Gibson case a year ago," he adds wryly.
    Describing TMZ's Gibson DUI scoop as a "defining moment" for the Web site, the L.A. native reasons that "we're not going after celebrities for sport and we're not in bed with them either because we want to do the next sit-down interview with them. We're just trying to be honest.
    "It sounds simplistic, but we're just trying to be authentic.
    "I think a lot of celebrities look at the site, and I'm guessing some days they love us and some days they hate us, and that's probably the way it should be."
    With his site increasingly setting the news agenda rather than following it, Levin is all too aware that with great power comes great responsibility.
    Keen to distance TMZ from the guerrilla tactics allegedly perpetrated by some competitors, Levin says, "We have some strict rules here. We do not break the law, we don't chase people. We don't trespass onto private property. We have kind of a 'yuck' factor - if something doesn't feel right, we don't do it."
    Citing two examples, he recalls that "somebody came to us with a video of Heather Locklear [at the height of the Denise Richards scandal], and nobody had seen her for a while. The video was of her walking to her car with one of her kids, and there were a bunch of camera people there. It was in a public area, but the kid looked scared and it felt intrusive, so we didn't run it.
    "I had a woman come into my office with the most shocking documents I've ever seen in connection with the Michael Jackson case. I talked to her for five minutes and I realized she'd stolen those documents from a law office that she had worked at. That would have been an unbelievable story, but the documents were ill-gotten and we just turned them away. I think that's just the way to do business."
    Keen to point out he's every bit as involved as the rest of his 25 staff members in actual news-gathering, Levin maintains, "I'm in the firing line. It's controlled chaos here. It's a really young staff and it's a staff that's really grown over the last couple of years in terms of experience, and everybody has contacts. I've worked really hard with my contacts and everybody else works theirs, and we help each other and it's very egalitarian."
    "I'm an old fart in this process," Levin, 56, chuckles.
    Though Levin maintains he'll be heavily involved in the forthcoming TMZ TV show's September launch, don't expect him to follow in the footsteps of the celebrities he covers just yet.
    All too aware of the potential pitfalls of fame, he concludes, "I'm getting sick of me on TV, I really am."


    (dailynews.com)

    :tatort :cool

  • Zitat

    the most shocking documents I've ever seen in connection with the Michael Jackson case


    so... wobei man sich jetzt fragen muss:
    waren diese dokumente so schockierend, weil sie etwas gegen michael aussagten ODER waren diese dokumente so schockierend, weil sie den ganzen fall als "frei erfunden" dargestellt hätten?!
    hmm... aus der presse werd ich auch nicht mehr schlau... geben schon genauso klare aussagen von sich wie raymone... lol

    He's not an artist, he's a fucking work of art...



    I love you more, Mike!

  • Zitat

    "I had a woman come into my office with the most shocking documents I've ever seen in connection with the Michael Jackson case. I talked to her for five minutes and I realized she'd stolen those documents from a law office that she had worked at. That would have been an unbelievable story, but the documents were ill-gotten and we just turned them away. I think that's just the way to do business."


    "Eine Frau kam in mein Büro mit den schockierendsten Dokumenten die ich jemals in Verbindung mit dem Fall Michael Jackson gesehen habe. Ich habe fünf Minuten mit ihr gesprochen und erkannt, dass sie diese Dokumente aus einem Büro gestohlen hatte, in der sie arbeitete. Das wäre eine unglaubliche Geschichte gewesen, aber die Dokumente waren nicht rechtmäßig erworben und wir haben sie weg gegeben. Ich denke, so verhält man sich in unserem Geschäft."

    He's not an artist, he's a fucking work of art...



    I love you more, Mike!

  • Bitte, gern geschehen. :blumen


    na, eben das frag ich mich auch, obwohl ich inzwischen zu folgendem schluss tendieren würde:
    WENN das material belastend für mike gewesen wäre, hätte es sicherlich diane diamond (oder so) doch längst schon in großaufnahme gebracht, nicht? die frau wird es doch auch bei anderen stationen versucht haben... denk ich mal!

    He's not an artist, he's a fucking work of art...



    I love you more, Mike!

  • neeee...sehen wirs doch mal so....
    was verkauft sich SO gut, dass die presse auf alle regeln des fairen journalismus scheisst, und sogar gesetze missachtet?


    richtig... NEGATIVES material!
    je fieser und intimer, umso besser!
    dafür würden diese leute ihre oma verscherbeln. (tmez ganz weit vorne mit dabei)



    fakten, die FÜR michael und seine version sprechen, punkte, die michael HELFEN und ihn positiv darstellen, werden wohl eher weniger interessant sein.
    auch wenn der inhalt brisant ist - ein negativ-jackson bild kann man eben langfristig besser aufrechterhalten und seine verkaufszahlen damit hoch halten,
    denn die menschen sind krank, lsen lieber skandale, als 'friede-freude-eierkuchen geschichten.
    also isses für mich klar,
    wenn die story net erfunden is (was man ja nie wissen kann - und wenn man es SO wortlos in den raum stellt bleibt eben jede menge raum für spekulationen...) wenn als die story so passiert ist,
    dann dürften diese papiere wohl eher ne 'bombshell' PRO michael beinhalten.
    das ist jedenfalls meine sicht zu der story :Q




  • Ich sehe das auch so wie du. Viele Dinge die Michaels Unschuld belegen wurden im Chandler sowie im letzten Fall unter den Teppich gekehrt . Sowas verkauft sich einfach nicht . Die Leute wollen andere Sachen lesen .Auserdem hat er mit wenig sagen viel Fragen offengelassen . Das regt dann schon zum nachdenken an unds so soll es sein


    Ich würde trotzdem gern wissen aus welchem Büro das kommt usw. Naja man kann net alles haben .

Jetzt mitmachen!

Du hast noch kein Benutzerkonto auf unserer Seite? Registriere dich kostenlos und nimm an unserer Community teil!