Der Jackson-Family-Thread

Ich weiß gar nicht, was der da brabbelt. Er soll Michael gezeigt haben, wie man ordentlich ins Mikro spricht und das Mikro handhabt. Das ist ja wirklich nichts von übrig geblieben! Auch die Antworten, die er da gibt, merkwürdig - er spricht die Sätze gar nicht zu Ende! Könnte er ....?

er is nicht mehr ganz bei sich - das denke ich auch.
allerdings schon lange, wenn man mich fragt

Zitat von Stella

Kann der nicht einfach mal nur sagen : Michael ist/war mein geliebter Sohn

Vielleicht war er das nie.

Meine Fresse, ist das ein Kotzbrocken. Sein Gefasel wird auch immer undeutlicher. Bäh, ich find den Kerl so widerlich!
Mit seinem Hut, seiner Sonnenbrille und seinem widerlichen Ohrring gehört der echt zwangseingewiesen. Zum Kohle scheffeln war michael immer gut genug, aber ihm einfach mal ein bisschen Liebe geben, da war dieses Arschloch nie fähig. Wen interessiert denn sein 4812 Odelwasser? Auch wenn Michael selber gern "eingedieselt" (I say it with L.O.V.E.) war, so lecker wie Michael wird das Klowasser vom ollen JOe nie riechen. Und wer soll das Zeug kaufen??
Mich kotzt das echt so an, dass der alte Faltenköter ständig auf irgendwelche Musikevents rennt, um seine unsinnigen Geschäfte zu verbreiten. Es interessiert niemanden. Buddelt den doch endlich mal ein.... um den ist es nicht schade... (klingt zwar hart aber ist doch so...)

Faltenköter :lmao:lmao:lmao

:lmao...gut gebrüllt..Lucky

^ Na weil's wahr is.... wobei das für den Hund schon wieder eine Beleidigung ist....

[ATTACH=CONFIG]4813[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]4812[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]4814[/ATTACH]

Interview ist von September 2011, ich weiß nicht, ob wir es hier schon irgendwo haben
Es ist heute erst bei Orchadtimes erschienen ......

EXCLUSIVE: Jermaine Jackson Interview

In September 2011, controversy surrounded Jermaine Jackson. A misquoted portion of his memoir had sparked outrage. A planned tribute concert in Cardiff had caused a rift in his family. Amidst all of this, Dr Conrad Murray’s involuntary manslaughter trial was mere days away. Shelved without explanation by the Huffington Post, Charles Thomson’s interview with the star provided a window on his state of mind amid the brewing storm. Precisely five months later, fans can finally read it exclusively here on the Orchard Times.
It’s mid-September and Jermaine Jackson is winding up a grueling UK book tour. He’s spent the last four days making back-to-back television and radio appearances. When his car picks me up in Wood Lane, London and drives us into the BBC Studios, he has just appeared on Loose Women – Britain’s answer to The View – and is on his way to be interviewed by BBC Radio 5 Live’s Richard Bacon.
As we’re led inside, several dozen teenagers on a BBC walkabout lose all interest in their tour guide as they spot Michael Jackson’s brother passing through the building. I feel self-conscious as their stares follow us through the foyer but Jermaine seems not to notice. It comes with the territory, I suppose. As one of the figureheads of America’s most famous family, he’s become accustomed to outsiders constantly looking in. The problem as he sees it, though, is that what they see is often a warped image presented by the media. This, he says, is why he has written his new book, You Are Not Alone: Michael Through A Brother’s Eyes.
“How was Loose Women?” I ask him, as we wait for an elevator.
“Well…” He half-grins and exhales loudly. “They were loose.”
I watch the Loose Women interview later on YouTube. Like many of his recent interviews, it was combative. As Jermaine tried to speak about his brother from a firsthand perspective he was repeatedly interrupted by the hosts. Michael was a ‘complex character’, they tell him. He ‘must have been a sick person.’
The assumption by many that they know more about Michael than his own family is a bug-bear of Jermaine’s. This attitude, he says, is the result of a decades-long battle against inaccurate media coverage. “This would become a recurring theme for the family,” he writes in the book, “a showdown of fact versus perception – and fact would always be the underdog.”
According to Jermaine, even his initial attempt to write a book, back in 2003, fell flat because publishers were unwilling to print a factual account of his brother’s life.
“I had tried to write something with Judith Regan with Harper Collins in New York and they weren’t interested in the truth then,” he tells me as we sit down in an empty radio studio. “They were interested in the gossip and all the things that were not true. They wanted dirt and I said, ‘I have no dirt’, so they turned me down.”
Eight years later, Harper Collins has come around to Jermaine’s way of thinking. His book is described by the publisher as “an intimate, loving portrait of Michael Jackson.” But Jermaine hasn’t forgotten the 2003 debacle. “They tried to put me on the Judith Regan show on this book tour,” he says. “I said, ‘No way.’”
The book has been mired in controversy. As Jermaine flew to London, a storm was brewing over a portion of his prologue. Writing about his brother’s 2005 child molestation trial, Jermaine wrote that he was paranoid Michael would fall victim to a terrible injustice, so he hatched a secret escape plan. He arranged for a private jet to be on standby at the nearest airport, ready to whisk his brother to Bahrain if things looked bleak.
But many journalists, apparently too lazy even to read Jermaine’s nine-page prologue before writing about it, got it monumentally wrong. It all started when one story misquoted the prologue and said the Jackson family had planned to spirit Michael away to the Middle East after he was convicted. Copy-and-paste journalism took hold and the story was replicated hundreds of times by newspapers and websites including the New York Post, NY Daily News, Denver Post and Washington Times. Even the Press Association got it wrong.
The nonsensical story made Jermaine’s book look like a work of fiction, a situation worsened when Michael’s 2005 defense attorney Thomas Mesereau publicly blasted the claim.
“One of the reasons I wrote the book was so that my words would stand for themselves, in context,” says Jermaine. “But even in the newspapers’ coverage of my book my words were misreported. There was never a plan to get Michael out of the country ‘if convicted’. Thomas Mesereau had to issue a denial based on something that wasn’t true in the first place. That one change of context showed how one inaccuracy can snowball and how myths are made. I sat back and thought ‘This is what Michael faced all the time’.”
“The pyjama day stands out a lot in my mind,” he says, referring to the morning during his brother’s trial when the star arrived at court wearing pyjama trousers. Michael had slipped in the shower, he later told Jesse Jackson in a radio interview, and bruised his lung. He received a call at the hospital, informing him that if he didn’t arrive at court within a strict time limit, he would go to the cells. With no time to go home and change, he sped to court wearing the clothes he was taken to hospital in and hobbled up the courthouse path in his pyjamas, the agony etched across his face.
The media largely dismissed the injury as a publicity stunt – as though Jackson needed the publicity at the time – or a desperate bid for sympathy. That week, his accuser’s story fell apart during cross-examination, a fact that went almost entirely unreported by a media too preoccupied with the star’s bedwear.
“That’s when I went to the hospital and I saw him,” Jermaine continues. “We had a talk and he just said he’s the most misunderstood person in the world. He was serious and he was tearing [up] and I hugged him and it’s like, you see where we come from and we’re no different from any other family but the success, it sort of just overwhelms the human person in him.
“So much, they talk about the legend and this and that but he’s a human being. He’s a father who loved his children, who would spend a lot of time with them.
“I brought my kids over one time and Prince and Paris were acting up. Michael said, ‘I’m very disappointed in you, you all are acting crazy in front of Jafaar and Jermajesty so you’re grounded’. I mean, he was so on them that he wanted them to be good. He would not agree today, if he was alive then he would not let them be on the internet and all this kind of stuff. He was totally against all that stuff.”
Following Michael’s death and his kids’ move into the Jackson family home in Encino, California, videos leaked of the trio singing and playing in front of a webcam. At first the footage was blamed on a hacking but then the kids’ twitter accounts appeared. Are the accounts real, I ask Jermaine.
“Yes. That’s them. Yes. And we’re against it. We have meetings with my mother about it. She can’t control it. She’s 81 years old. They had the computers taken away from them and then they got them back and they say they need them for homework but they’re doing that little thing here and there.”
“It’s like any other parent tackling teenage kids,” Jermaine’s co-writer Steve Dennis chips in.
“Yea,” Jermaine agrees. “Prince got a girlfriend!”
I ask him whether the YouTube videos were in fact released by the kids, not stolen by a hacker.
“They’re doing that stuff!” he replies. “Yes! One person out there got in a confrontation with Paris and started calling her father all these kinds of names and stuff and I said, ‘See, this is why they don’t need to be on the internet. These people aren’t all nice. They’re waiting to say horrible things.’”
How does he feel about the kids appearing at the Cardiff tribute, I ask. He looks shocked.
“At the tribute? No. They’re gonna be there?”
I tell him that the press are saying the kids will appear onstage.
He pauses, then whispers: “Ohhh… wow.”
“See, Charles, I’ll tell you how I feel,” he says. “I try so hard to do the right thing because when you put something out there you have to live with it and it’s around forever, more so today than other times because of the internet and twitter and this and that. I had a conversation with my mother and I just explained to her how this is still not the proper time and then in the same conversation she tells me the brothers are rehearsing!
“So I’m saying to myself, ‘But the trial…’ Because, see, this is what I don’t want: What’s gonna happen in the trial is again, [they’ll] humiliate him, say the most horrible things and all this kind of stuff….But [the family] don’t see how two weeks into the trial, to do a show when the world is focused on getting justice for him… The performance can come later.”
The trial he refers to is that of Dr Conrad Murray, the man charged with the involuntary manslaughter of Michael Jackson. Opening statements are just weeks away and Jermaine has vowed not to promote his book once the court case is active. But Jermaine says he is sceptical as to whether the trial will provide the answers the family wants. For years Michael confided in friends and family that he believed he would be killed for his music publishing, whose value ran into billions of dollars – several times his much publicised debts. The family remain suspicious that his death wasn’t accidental.
Jermaine points towards the differences between his brother’s treatment and Conrad Murray’s as proof that the establishment had an agenda against his brother.
“We know somebody did this,” he says. “Whether we’ll find out or not, I don’t know. The trial is just a procedure, but just look how long it took. It makes me feel like they didn’t care. Look how long they took to arrest Murray compared how quick they put Michael in the handcuffs on national TV.”
Michael’s home was searched in November 2003 and jury selection was underway by January 2005. Conversely, Conrad Murray wasn’t arrested until almost eight months after Jackson’s death and it was another 18 before he went on trial.
“One thing that rubbed me the wrong way is when the judge said, ‘We wanna get this out of the way before the holidays’,” Jermaine grimaces. “This is the problem with LA and the whole justice system. It’s more important for them to have Thanksgiving, Christmas and New Years than to get justice for my brother. It’s like, who cares about that? We lost a brother! The world lost someone that they loved and they say, ‘We want to get this out of the way for the holidays’. That was the wrong thing for me to hear.”
“You need to hear how they treated him in the very last days”
Jermaine’s suspicions about the circumstances surrounding his brother’s death have been fuelled by tip-offs he has received from people who were inside rehearsals for the ill-fated This Is It concerts.
Perhaps the most shocking portion of Jermaine’s book has not yet been picked up on by the media – unsurprising, given that most journalists covering the book have seemingly not even finished the prologue. The chapter details eyewitness accounts given to Jermaine about his brother’s rehearsal sessions.
The witnesses paint Michael Jackson as a deer in the headlights; verbally abused by crew members, spied on by security and repeatedly showing signs of severe illness – signs which were allegedly ignored by money men pushing him far beyond his capabilities. Jermaine is especially sceptical of the concert film which smashed box office records in 2009.
“One of my sources told me that one day Michael was looking around and he said, ‘Who are these cameras for?’ He didn’t even know! What they did with This Is It, they covered up a lot, but we give you in the book the days that they didn’t show you.
“Michael wasn’t happy with how they hired people, ‘cuz he wanted people that he wanted to hire and they hired who they wanted to hire. So I guess they wanted everybody to be loyal to them.
“I spoke to five people who were either in rehearsals or in touch with Michael outside of them. They told me what they were doing to him. They could see he was hot and cold and so they’re throwing him jackets. Charles, they treated him so bad. Someone said, ‘Just chuck him a bucket of chicken’.
“But all someone had to do was call us up. Any one of us. Even the drummer from This Is It, who has been around us all these years, Jonathan Moffett, who knows us! Pick up the phone! Call me! Call Jackie! Michael would be alive today because we would have went there and said, ‘Can’t you see there’s something wrong? What are you all concerned about? The show? There won’t be no show if he’s not well’. And nobody said anything.
“I was told by one of these five people that they were told to stay off the internet, don’t contact [the family], what stays here, stays here. Just a lock down. So much that they had a person in his room! It reminds me of 9/11 when the thing hit the Pentagon and all the CIA went and grabbed all the little surveillance tapes from the Mom and Pop stores.
“When I tell my mother to this day, she says don’t tell me, don’t tell me. She cries. And I say mother, you need to know this. You need to hear how they treated him in the very last days.”
Dr Murray’s defence initially relied on similar testimony and his attorneys had requested permission to show outtakes from the documentary to prove Michael was already frail. However, they dropped the request when they were unable to find any compelling footage of the star looking feeble onstage. Participants in the rehearsals have publicly denied some of the allegations made in Jermaine’s book.
As Jermaine prepares to move to another studio for his next interview, I decide to part ways on a lighter subject. I ask him whether we’ll be seeing a return of the Jackson brothers’ reality TV show, Jackson Family Dynasty.
“No,” he giggles. “They don’t wanna have us back after that series?”
Why not, I ask.
“I don’t know,” he replies.
And what about a reunion tour? He may be opposed to the family scheduling a tribute concert in the middle of Dr Murray’s trial, but would he consider reuniting after the case concludes?
He beams: “I would love for the brothers to make a huge, huge press conference announcing a tour in Michael’s name. Just with the brothers around the world. That’s what the people wanna see. I’m going to work my butt off when I get back to try to make that happen. I would love to and that’s my goal. It should be the Jackson brothers doing a tour in memory of Michael. Playing the music around the world. That’s what it should be.”

Post Script: Conrad Murray was convicted of the involuntary manslaughter of Michael Jackson in November 2011. Later that month, he was given the maximum sentence of four years in jail.
During Murray’s trial, This Is It director Kenny Ortega testified that Jackson had missed numerous rehearsals. He told jurors that on June 19th 2009, Jackson’s condition at rehearsals had been ‘deeply troubling’. Jackson was ‘chilled’ and ‘incoherent’. “He wasn’t there,” said Ortega. “Something was wrong.” Ortega suggested Jackson go home early that night.
In an email written to concert promoter Randy Phillips about the incident, Ortega said Jackson was like a ‘lost boy’. The email spoke of organisers having already ‘played the tough love, now or never card’. It said Jackson was rapidly losing weight and ‘terribly frightened’. There was talk of ‘pulling the plug’. “As far as I can tell,” wrote Ortega, “there is no one taking responsibility (caring for) for him.”
The email said: “Everything in me says he should be psychologically evaluated… He asked me repeatedly tonight if I was going to leave him. He was practically begging for my confidence.”
Concert promoters denied ever being concerned that the shows could be cancelled.

Quelle: http://www.orchardtimes.com

Joe Jackson Wrongful Death Lawsuit Tossed Out of Court

Joe Jackson screwed up by filing a Michael Jackson wrongful death lawsuit against AEG and Dr. Conrad Murray ... a judge has just ruled.

Joe filed his wrongful death lawsuit AFTER Katherine Jackson filed hers -- on her own behalf and on behalf of the kids.

It's unclear why Joe didn't try to join in Katherine's suit rather than filing a separate one on his own. It's possible Katherine didn't want him.

Whatever the reason, the judge said you can't have 2 suits that allege the exact same thing, and since Katherine filed first Joe loses.

Joe could now try to horn in on Katherine's legal action -- if she'll let him.

^
Ich schmeiß mich weg Zu blöd der Typ...

Oooooch - sowas aber auch ...

Hier noch etwas dazu

AEG dropped from negligence lawsuit filed by Michael Jackson's father

By Bill Hetherman City News Service
Posted: 02/21/2012 11:18:21 AM PST
Updated: 02/21/2012 11:35:37 AM PS

LOS ANGELES - The promoters of what was to be Michael Jackson's 2009 comeback tour won a round in court today when a judge granted a motion to dismiss the company from a lawsuit filed by the singer's father.

"This was a major victory," AEG Live attorney Marvin Putnam said of Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Yvette Palazuelos' ruling.

The decision leaves Jackson's former physician, Dr. Conrad Murray, and Applied Pharmacy Services in Las Vegas as the remaining defendants.

Joe Jackson's attorney, Maureen Jaroscak, downplayed the significance of the ruling, saying it was only a temporary setback. She said her client is a "nominal party" in a separate case filed against AEG Live by his wife, Katherine Jackson, but that he was never served with it. Jaroscak said Joe Jackson could now file an answer to his wife's complaint and become a party to the case.

Joe Jackson alleged AEG Live was negligent in hiring Murray. He also alleges Applied Pharmacy Services sold Murray propofol the month before the singer's June 25, 2009, death at age 50.

Lawyers for AEG have denied any wrongdoing by their client, which organized the sold-out London concert tour for which the entertainer was preparing in Los Angeles when he died.

Murray was convicted Nov. 7 of involuntary manslaughter in Jackson's death and sentenced to four years in prison.

Attorneys for AEG Live questioned in court papers whether 83-year-old Joe Jackson

Advertisement

is a lawful heir to the King of Pop under the state's wrongful death statute, noting that Joe Jackson said in interviews that his son never supported him financially.
The singer was frank about his relationship with his father, the AEG Live court papers stated.

"At the time Michael Jackson died, (his father) was estranged from his son, who repeatedly and publicly accused him of physical and other abuse," according to the AEG Live court papers.

But the lawyers said that, even if Joe Jackson could show he was an heir, he should have included his claims within the negligence case against AEG Live brought in September 2010 by Katherine Jackson two months before he filed his own case.

"The law is well-established that all plaintiffs must join together in a single wrongful death action against any given defendant," the AEG Live court papers stated. "AEG Live will not speculate as to why (Joe Jackson) was not joined in, and did not seek to join, Mrs. Jackson's lawsuit."

Joe Jackson could still try and become a party to his wife's case, the AEG Live court papers stated. If he can prove that Katherine Jackson's lawyers improperly left him out of her case, he can ask for damages against her, according to the AEG Live court papers.

In her nine-page ruling, Palazuelos agreed with Putnam that there should be only one wrongful death action and not two.

"Allowing Joseph Jackson to continue with his subsequent suit against AEG Live, alleging the same wrongful death claims as the related case, would contravene the purpose of the one-action rule," Palazuelos wrote. "Indeed, plaintiff's interpretation of the one-action rule would allow the heirs of a decedent to file as many suits as there are heirs."

The judge reiterated her position during the hearing.

"I don't think there's any way around this," she said. "You can't maintain a concurrent action."

Palazuelos scheduled trial of Joseph Jackson's suit for Jan. 28 next year. Palazuelos also is managing Katherine Jackson's case, which is set for trial Sept. 10.

Katherine Jackson alleges in her suit that AEG Live is responsible for medical decisions made by Murray.

http://www.presstelegram.com

Ne, oder??? Was für Mistsäue! Sind die noch ganz bei Trost Hayvenhurst zu verscherbeln???
Sorry, da könnt ich echt an die Decke gehen! Andere Menschen kämpfen wie Löwen, um das
Familienanwesen erhalten zu können, nehmen sogar Verbindlichkeiten auf, um sich nicht von dem Elternhaus
trennen zu müssen. Und was machen diese undankbaren Plagen? Sie schwimmen in Michaels Geld
und jetzt wollen sie auch noch das von Michael liebevoll für die Familie gestaltete Haus verhökern?!!
Michael hat dort zwei große Räume im Dachgeschoss mit Familienfotos tapeziert und gestaltet, sein
eigenes Herzblut und seine eigenhändige Arbeit steckt da drinnen! Ich glaubs einfach nicht

Für mich sind die BEIDEN Senioren echt nicht mehr zurechnungsfähig, total neben der Spur

24.02.12: MJ Estate darf Hayvenhurst verkaufen

Das Michael Jackson Estate hat gestern die Erlaubnis erhalten, das Jacksons Familienheim Hayvenhurst verkaufen zu dürfen. Die Nachlassverwaltung will das Anwesen aber nicht abgeben, zumindest noch nicht, da es gerade umfangreich renoviert wird, weiss TMZ.

Der Richter gab eine weitere Anordnung, damit USD 30 Millionen an den Jackson Family Trust überwiesen werden können. Katherine Jackson, Michaels Kinder und die Wohltätigkeitsorganisationen profitieren von diesem.

Katherines Anwalt Perry Sanders nahm gegenüber TMZ Stellung zu der Meldung: „Es ist unsere Abmachung, dass der Antrag, Hayvenhurst zu verkaufen, zurückgezogen wird, und dies geschieht bloss um die Erlaubnis zu erhalten, damit die Erben einen anderen Wohnsitz kaufen können.“ Und fügte hinzu: „Weder Mrs. Jackson noch Michaels Kinder wollen, dass Hayvenhurst verkauft wird und wir sind nicht in Kenntnis über irgend ein Vorhaben auf Seiten der Nachlassverwaltung, einen Antrag, das Familienhaus zu verkaufen, neu einzureichen.”

Quelle: jackson.ch, tmz.com

..mich zerreissts grad :lmao...Toyota in action..:never

[video=youtube;ziXOLhcRtJg]

Latoya zu Wendy: Wenn Dein Vater ein Parfume herausbringen würde und es Legend nach Dir benennen, Du wärest stolz, Dich würde es nicht stören, Michael hätte es nicht gestört.
Wendy: Dad, es würde mich stören.

Hier noch ein kleiner Artikel dazu:
http://www.contactmusic.com/news/la-...rances_1297450

Michael Jackson - La Toya Jackson: 'Michael Would Approve Of Dad's Tribute Fragrances'
24 February 2012 19:01

La Toya Jackson: 'Michael Would Approve Of Dad's Tribute Fragrances'

Michael Jackson's sister La Toya has defended her father for launching his own King of Pop tribute perfumes, insisting the late superstar would not have prevented his dad making money off his celebrity.

Joe Jackson teamed up with his business partner Franck Rouas and unveiled the fragrances Jackson Tribute and Jackson Legend last year (11).

The Jackson family patriarch has since taken to flogging the scents at a kiosk in a mall in Las Vegas in a bid to turn a profit - a move which has drawn criticism from fans of the Thriller hitmaker.

But his daughter La Toya has urged detractors to back off, reminding them that her ageing dad was the one who discovered Michael's talent and turned him into a pop icon.

During an appearance on The Wendy Williams Show, which aired in the U.S. on Friday (24Feb12), she said, "We wouldn't have a Michael if there wasn't for Joseph Jackson (sic). He gave Michael to us... He is wonderful, so when you say, 'He's Joe Jackson, he's Michael Jackson's father, how could he do this (profit off his son's name)?' That's his father, that's his son."

La Toya Jackson admits she was unaware of her father's attempts to sell the perfumes in a mall, but that shouldn't deter the King of Pop's fans from purchasing a bottle.
Latoya gibt zu sie wusste nichts von des Vater`s Versuchen das Parfume in einem Geschäft zu verkaufen, aber das sollte die KOP`s Fans nicht abhalten eine Flasche zu kaufen.

She added, "He did have a big opening (for the fragrances) and I guess the next day he decided to go out and sit there (at the mall kiosk). After all, come on, he's 84 years old...
Sie fügt hinzu "Er hatte eine große Eröffnung für das Parfume und ich denke am nächsten Tag entschied er dort wieder hinzugehen und dort zu sitzen am Verkaufsstand. Er ist 84....
"Michael wouldn't have minded at all... He really wouldn't. He would say, 'Go for it.'"
"Michael hätte es nichts ausgemacht.. Er würde sich nicht drum kümmern. Er würde sagen, "Hol es Dir"

The tribute fragrances have not been sanctioned by Michael's estate executors and Joe is facing legal action over the products from executives at Bravado, a firm which retains the commercial rights to sell products under the Thriller icon's name.

:tatort..DAS wag ich mal schlichtweg zu bezweifeln...dumm Kuh

nööööö, mike hätte das nicht gestört. natüüüürlich nicht.
er hat ja ALLES gut gefunden, was diese family angefangen hat.
er hat - wie wir alle wissen - ja auch stets deren projekte unterstützt,
und war auch gerne bereit, auch noch für klopapier sein gesicht herzugeben,
wenn nur sein daddy sich einen drauf jubeln kann, dass er mike als melkkuh nutzen konnte!

mann...toya...geh in betreutes wohnen, und verschone die welt mit deiner hirnscheiße!
und nimm die alten und wenigstens 2 brüder gleich noch mit.
und bitte - wir wollen garnicht wissen, wo ihr hin verschwindet...
löst euch einfach in luft auf.
es wird euch keiner vermissen.

twitter

Jermaine Jackson

HAYVENHURST IS NOT BEING SOLD. I can assure you that Mother's position remains the same and I'm told the Estate is honoring her strong wishes.

As I understand it, what has happened is a technical requirement where a judge has approved the right to sell in the theoretical event that Mother changes her mind. But, for as long as her advisors have her interests and wishes at heart, she won't.

I hope the Estate releases a statement to reassure the fans and end all ambiguity about the sacrosanct nature of Hayvenhurst's long-term future.

Zitat von badwoman

naja, das neue haus ist halt auch gewaltig grösser...und je älter man wird, umso mehr platz braucht man wohl...:skepsis

Was will die Alte denn mit einem noch größeren Haus?? Sie ist doch eh nicht mehr die allerfiteste. Das ist wie beim Autofahren. Die Alten, die nicht mehr gut sehen und kaum noch was hören und nur noch eine minimale Reaktionsfähigkeit besitzen, müssen die größten Karren fahren

Zitat

HAYVENHURST IS NOT BEING SOLD

Dein Wort in Gottes Gehörgang, Jermaine!