Michael Jackson's Will // Alles zum Testament und Katherines Mühen um mehr Mitsprache

  • Jackson family in legal bid for his money


    Mother accused of 'frankly improper race to courthouse' before funeral


    By Guy Adams in Los Angeles
    Monday, 6 July 2009

    The next round in the billion-dollar battle over Michael Jackson's estate will play out in a Los Angeles court today, as the singer's family spends the eve of his funeral applying for his possessions to be transferred to their control.



    Judge Mitchell Beckloff will decide whether the King of Pop's worldly goods should be temporarily turned over to a trust that will benefit his mother, three children, and various charities.


    Although the Michael Jackson Family Trust was created by what appears to be the singer's final will, written in 2002, the speed of the family's attempt to get its hands on the inheritance has prompted widespread criticism.


    A lawyer for John Branca and John McClain, who are Jackson's executors, last week accused Katherine Jackson, 79, of "a race to the courthouse that is, frankly, improper".


    A stone's throw from Los Angeles Superior Court, where a record 70 news organisations have applied to broadcast live from 9am local time [5pm GMT], plans are taking shape for Jackson's private funeral and public memorial service tomorrow. More than 1.6 million people registered for tickets to the service at the Staples Centre, a sports arena and concert venue in central Los Angeles. Just 8,750 of them learnt last night that they had two free passes in a computerised lottery.


    Details of the event have yet to be announced, but the organiser Randy Phillips said to expect a mixture of songs, readings and speeches, rather than the razzmatazz of a pop concert. The Jackson family has been given 9,000 tickets to distribute to friends.


    "In his private life, Michael was something of a traditionalist, so it would be wrong for this to be anything but a reverent, poignant, memorial," Mr Phillips said. "It won't be a show; it's a service. There will be a time, in the future, to celebrate him. But now is the time to bury him." Mr Phillips, the head of AEG Live, the firm that was promoting Jackson's comeback concerts at the O2 Arena in London, is "conceptualising" the memorial with Ken Erlich, who masterminds the Grammys, and Kenny Ortega, the producer of Dirty Dancing. He said they have "a list of people" who are being asked to perform or appear.


    No decision has yet been made on whether Jackson's gold-plated coffin will be transported to the Staples Centre, or whether it will go straight to the Forest Lawn Cemetery, where he is to be buried tomorrow. "The casket is a public safety issue and, like every detail of the memorial, it must also be signed off by Katherine Jackson," Mr Phillips said.


    He has faced criticism for allowing the 50-year-old singer to attempt a demanding series of 50 gigs. But he says Jackson was in perfect shape, and last week released video footage of him singing and dancing during rehearsal on 23 June, just 48 hours before he died.


    "In the past year, I knew Michael Jackson more than anybody, and the only problem I had with him was that he was a bit like an absent-minded professor when it came to eating," Mr Phillips said. "He was too slim. Other than that, he was fit and healthy, and the video proves it."


    Some reports have suggested that AEG could lose as much as £100m from the cancelled concerts. But Mr Phillips insisted they have "no financial concerns". Ticket-holders have been offered a refund, but between 20 and 30 per cent are choosing instead to be given specially designed, hologrammed tribute tickets, to keep as a memento.


    AEG also owns 100 hours of video footage of rehearsals for the comeback concerts, together with audio recordings of the singer practising. "Obviously, I wish he were still here," Mr Phillips added. "I loved him. But we were filming the last days of Michael Jackson's rehearsals, and we have enough audio for two live albums. It could eradicate, or at least minimise our losses."


    Los Angeles police are hoping to prevent hundreds of thousands of people descending on the streets, and have vetoed any procession. People without tickets will be banned from several blocks around the venue



    Jackson family in legal bid for his money - News, Music - The Independent

  • Ist es jetzt also doch nicht geklärt, ob sein Körper bei der Zeremonie anwesend sein wird oder nicht? Oh Mann, wie ich diese blöden Sachen hasse. Einer sagt so, einer sagt so. Hauptsache, man hat was gesagt.

  • Michael Jackson's Estate Open For Business


    July 14, 2009 10:02 AM ET


    Two weeks after Michael Jackson's death, administrators of his estate are temporarily authorized to reopen for business and negotiate, among other things, agreements relating to the singer's ill-fated "This Is It" concert tour.


    While fans in London on Monday lit candles and placed flowers outside the O2 Arena where the entertainer was due to begin his run of 50 concerts, lawyers were in a Los Angeles Superior Court ironing out details of the powers given to two men named by Jackson to administer his estate.


    Superior Court Judge Mitchell Beckloff conferred wide-ranging authority on attorney John Branca and recording executive John McClain, at least until Aug. 3 when another hearing is scheduled.


    The list of powers for the administrators includes taking control of all of Jackson's physical assets and placing them in secure storage facilities; hiring people with expertise in handling various aspects of the estate with fees subject to court approval; and handling tax matters.


    The judge also authorized Branca and McClain to negotiate with AEG, the producers of the concert, for the benefit of the estate.


    Attorney Paul Gordon Hoffman, a member of the team representing Branca and McClain, said a quick court order was needed so the two men could "begin to take the actions necessary to preserve the assets of the estate and address the needs" of Jackson's three children.


    Meanwhile, papers filed in court showed Jackson's mother, Katherine, is seeking a stronger role in her late son's affairs.


    Hoffman said in a nine-page declaration that as late as 4:10 p.m. Sunday, an attorney for the Jackson family sent an e-mail "stating that it was his intent to have the order reflect that Katherine Jackson should be treated like a third trustee."


    Hoffman argued that to gain that power, attorneys for Katherine Jackson would need to appear and submit a competing proposed order. No such order was submitted.


    The judge signed the papers without hearing further argument.


    Hoffman said in his filing that Branca and McClain have been submitting to Katherine Jackson's lawyers "voluminous and continuous information on the business opportunities being presented and their responses or intended responses."


    Hoffman said Katherine Jackson's lawyers "have stated that they were pleased with the information being provided, and that their objections were not predicated on the actual provision of information, but rather on the lack of a formal role for Katherine Jackson or a court-ordered requirement that the information be provided."


    Attorney Burt Levitch, who appeared for Katherine Jackson, referred questions to New York lawyer Londell McMillan. A call to McMillan was not immediately returned on Monday. Branca's lawyer, Howard Weitzman, declined to comment.


    Beckloff stated at a hearing July 6 that he was not appointing Katherine Jackson as a co-administrator but suggested she should be kept aware of what the administrators are doing. He suggested he should be notified as well.


    Also Monday, the judge formally revoked his earlier order that gave Katherine Jackson limited powers over some of her son's possessions when it was believed he died without a will.


    Jackson died on June 25, leaving a will that provided for a trust to be administered by Branca and McClain. The beneficiaries named were his mother, his three children and an unnamed group of children's charities.




    Michael Jackson's Estate Open For Business

  • Ich verstehe nicht, warum Katherine da so hartnäckig ist. Irgendwas muss da sein.


    wenn debbie paris und prince bekommt, werden diese zum einen von Blanket getrennt und zweitens hätte sie Macht über fast 70 mio. dollar der Kinder, was katherine vermutlich nicht will (im sinne der kinder) und die kiddies bei ihr wahrscheinlich besser aufgehoben sind, als bei debbie.

  • wenn debbie paris und prince bekommt, werden diese zum einen von Blanket getrennt und zweitens hätte sie Macht über fast 70 mio. dollar der Kinder, was katherine vermutlich nicht will (im sinne der kinder) und die kiddies bei ihr wahrscheinlich besser aufgehoben sind, als bei debbie.


    wie kommsch auf debbie...? :?

  • Der Verwaltung von Michaels Nachlass hat absolut nichts mit dem Sorgerecht zu tun. Und ihren Anteil hat Kathrine so oder so.


    sorry, hatte mir den falschen artikel durchgelesen und dann auf deinen kommentar geantwortet :sneddi :rotwerd

  • Ich weiss, blöde Frage, meint ihr dass es noch ein neueres Testament gibt?


    Ich kenne mich mit sowas nich aus, woher weiß man denn überhaupt, wo so ein Testament liegt?
    Hat man das Zuhause rumliegen oder bei einem Anwalt oder woanders? Ick hab echt keine Ahnung, sorry :verlegen
    Bitte um Aufklärung!

    [CENTER]Michael, Ich werde dich immer lieben. Ich hoffe es gibt ein "da oben" und es geht dir gut dort. Wir werden dich alle so sehr vermissen.[/CENTER]

  • alles möglich nur sollte man in michaels fall und auch generell um lästige fragen zu klären es schon notariell beglaubigen lassen und es in sicherheitskopie auch beim anwalt oder eben besagtem notar liegen haben

  • So ist es. Ich verstehe nicht, warum es dieses Heckmeck erst geben musste. Das Testament war auch notariel beglaubigt und es hatte alles seine Ordnung. Was ich schräg finde ist, dass die Familie meint, er würde sein Testament alle 5 Jahre aktualisieren und dass dem zufolge ein Testament von 2007 existieren sollte. :?
    Wär ja großartig, wenn es dann irgendwie in ein paar Monaten oder Jahren auftaucht. Das könnte eventuell ganz schön großes Chaos anrichten.

  • Ich gehe sehr stark davon aus, dass Michaels Testament bei einem Notar bzw. Anwalt hinterlegt wurde. Sollte es eine aktuellere Version von 2007 geben, wäre sie doch bestimmt schon aufgetaucht. Eine Größe wie Michael Jackson setzt sicherlich kein handschriftliches Testament auf und bewahrt es bei sich zu Hause auf.
    Nur wundert es mich ehrlichgesagt auch, dass es kein aktuelleres aus der Zeit nach seinem Prozess gibt.

    [CENTER][SIGPIC][/SIGPIC][/CENTER][CENTER]"Mein Herz...mein Verstand...sind gebrochen. Ich liebte Michael mit meiner ganzen Seele und ich kann mir kein Leben ohne ihn vorstellen. Ich glaube nicht, dass jemand wusste, wie sehr wir einander liebten. Oh Gott, ich werde ihn so vermissen!" Elizabeth Taylor[/CENTER]

  • Jackson's Mom Keeps Option Open to Contest Will


    Posted Jul 17th 2009 8:03PM by TMZ Staff


    Lawyers for Michael Jackson's mother Katherine filed legal papers setting the stage for a fight over the singer's estate.


    Katherine's lawyers are not willing to accept that the will presented by Michael's lawyer, John Branca, is valid. In the papers, Katherine's lawyer writes about the "purported will" Branca filed.


    Katherine's lawyers note that the 2002 will has a "no contest" clause, meaning anyone who mounts a legal fight over the will gets nothing.


    Katherine's lawyers want a judge to decide if that clause would apply if she fights the appointment of the executors under the will.


    Katherine's lawyers are hedging their bets, saying they are "continuing to collect and review relevant information."


    Quelle: Celebrity Gossip | Entertainment News | Celebrity News | TMZ.com
    --------------------------------------------------


    Hoffe, dass das hier richtig rein passt und dass wir das nicht schon hatten, falls ja, sorry für's doppelte Posten.


    Falls da was dran sein sollte, finde ich es merkwürdig, dass die plötzlich die Gültigkeit des Testaments doch anfechten/nicht akzeptieren wollen. Sah doch erst eher nicht so aus, oder? Warum kann Michaels Wille nicht einfach anerkannt werden!? :sad

  • Soweit ich weiß, ist Kathrine diesem Branca gegenüber etwas skeptisch. Angeblich hat er sich Jahre lang nicht bei Micheal gemeldet und plötzlich, wenige Tage vor seinem Tod, hat er wieder engen Kontakt zu Michael gepflegt und siehe da, er wird Testamentsverwalter/-vollstrecker.

    [CENTER][SIGPIC][/SIGPIC][/CENTER][CENTER]"Mein Herz...mein Verstand...sind gebrochen. Ich liebte Michael mit meiner ganzen Seele und ich kann mir kein Leben ohne ihn vorstellen. Ich glaube nicht, dass jemand wusste, wie sehr wir einander liebten. Oh Gott, ich werde ihn so vermissen!" Elizabeth Taylor[/CENTER]

  • Why is Michael's Mom Mounting Legal Challenge?
    Posted Jul 19th 2009 2:10AM by TMZ Staff


    Sources connected to Michael Jackson's family tell us some family members as well as lawyers for the estate are ticked off at some legal eagles who may be trying to start a legal war.


    Attorneys Londell McMillan and Burt Levitch do not represent Michael's estate -- they represent Katherine Jackson personally. They filed legal papers Friday asking a judge to rule if Katherine can object to the appointment of the executors named in Michael's will and still collect the money her son left her.


    Here's the issue. There's a "no contest" clause in the will, meaning anyone who files objections to the will automatically gets no money. McMillan and Levitch want to know if the "no contest" clause would apply if Katherine only objects to the executors Michael chose.


    Here's what's bugging some family members and the lawyers representing the estate ... the will gives Katherine 40% of Michael's estate, so she can't be upset about that. The will names Katherine guardian for the children .. again, that's what she wants. And the named executors -- John Branca and John McClain -- are Michael's longtime, trusted advisors and friends.


    So why would Katherine object to the will or the executors? A lot of people who are in the middle of it all feel Katherine is being manipulated and doesn't really understand the implications of mounting a legal challenge.


    So why are McMillan and Levitch kicking up dust?


    Quelle: Celebrity Gossip | Entertainment News | Celebrity News | TMZ.com


    Kann man nicht einfach seinen letzten Willen respektieren......... :sad

  • Jackson Family War Over Michael's Will


    Posted Jul 21st 2009 2:30AM by TMZ Staff


    Jackson family sources tell us there's a bitter dispute over who will call the shots in probating Michael Jackson's will.


    Katherine Jackson has hired an attorney -- Londell McMillan -- and we're told it's a done deal that McMillan will challenge the co-executors Michael selected. We're told most of the brothers -- Randy the notable exception -- are angry that McMillan has asserted himself by challenging co-executors John Branca and John McClain, both long time advisors and friends of M.J.


    Ultimately, Joe Jackson has asserted his influence over Katherine to hire McMillan for the dirty work. We're told Katherine is really being manipulated and doesn't even have real objections to Branca and McMillan.


    Randy is coy on who Joe and McMillan wants as executor instead, but the family is worried Joe and McMillan wants someone who will do anything but look out for the best interests of the estate -- especially since Joe is cut out of the will like a bad cancer.


    It's all shaping up to be an ugly mess.



    Jackson Family War Over Michael's Will | TMZ.com

  • Da kein Richter die zwei Johns einfach so durch andere Leute ersetzen würde, sehe ich da kein Problem. Selbst wenn die TMZ Story stimmt.
    Wenn die beiden Johns wirklich Mist bauen, sieht das natürlich anders aus. Aber bis dahin kann man nur abwarten.

  • Katherine Jackson -- I Will Be Heard!

    Posted Jul 22nd 2009 2:15AM by TMZ Staff


    Katherine Jackson wants "a seat at the table" in all matters involving Michael Jackson's estate.


    Katherine's lawyer, Londell McMillan, tells us Katherine called him the day Michael died, asking him to come to the house. McMillan says when he showed up the first weekend, Katherine and Joe expressed "concern" over the estate and hired him to represent Katherine's legal interests.


    McMillan says Katherine will not challenge the will, but as far as the executors are concerned, he says, "She deserves a seat at the table at a minimum." McMillan would not say if Katherine merely wanted to be named as a third executor or whether she wanted to challenge John Branca and John McClain, the named co-executors.


    Sources connected with Katherine claim she has already asked the co-executors to allow her to participate in the decision-making and her request was "rejected."


    McMillan says neither he nor Katherine are pushing for Joe to become a co-executor.


    McMillan, who worked for Michael Jackson during the last 3 1/2 years of the singer's life, also has repped Katherine on various business matters related to her son.


    McMillan says he's "optimistic they can work things out, but I'm prepared to go the distance if Mrs. Jackson directs to do so."


    Quelle: Celebrity Gossip | Entertainment News | Celebrity News | TMZ.com

Jetzt mitmachen!

Du hast noch kein Benutzerkonto auf unserer Seite? Registriere dich kostenlos und nimm an unserer Community teil!